Literature DB >> 17574499

Use of computed tomography scans for cochlear implants.

Bruce R Whiting1, Timothy A Holden, Barry S Brunsden, Charles C Finley, Margaret W Skinner.   

Abstract

While 3-dimensional (3D) imaging by computed tomography has long been desirable for research and treatment of cochlear-implant patients, technical challenges have limited its wide application. Recent developments in scanner hardware and image processing techniques now allow image quality improvements that make clinical applications feasible. Validation experiments were performed to characterize a new methodology and its imaging performance.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 17574499      PMCID： PMC3043842          DOI： 10.1007/s10278-007-9045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN： 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs.

Authors:  B R Whiting; K T Bae; M W Skinner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Imaging of small high-density structures in CT A phantom study.

Authors:  Empar Rollano-Hijarrubia; R Stokking; Frits van der Meer; Wiro J Niessen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures.

Authors:  C Studholme; D L Hill; D J Hawkes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Phillip A Wackym; Wolfgang Gaggl; Linda S Burg; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning: three-dimensional imaging of macroscopic biological specimens.

Authors:  A H Voie; D H Burns; F A Spelman
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear.

Authors:  M W Skinner; D R Ketten; M W Vannier; G A Gates; R L Yoffie; W A Kalender
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-09
  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  High-resolution secondary reconstructions with the use of flat panel CT in the clinical assessment of patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M S Pearl; A Roy; C J Limb
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Topography of neurovascular structures in relation to round window and how it relates to cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Anjali Singla; Tulika Gupta; Daisy Sahni; Ashok Kumar Gupta; Anjali Aggarwal
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Dose-efficient ultrahigh-resolution scan mode using a photon counting detector computed tomography system.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Zhicong Yu; Ahmed Halaweish; Steffen Kappler; Katharina Hahn; Andre Henning; Zhoubo Li; John Lane; David L Levin; Steven Jorgensen; Erik Ritman; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-22

4.  Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Teymouri; Timothy E Hullar; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.

Authors:  Xenia Meshik; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Three-dimensional histological specimen preparation for accurate imaging and spatial reconstruction of the middle and inner ear.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Waldemar Würfel; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Authors:  R A Helal; R Jacob; M A Elshinnawy; A I Othman; I M Al-Dhamari; D W Paulus; T T Abdelaziz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.