Literature DB >> 17572898

Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears having just one auditory neuron.

Manfred Kössl1, Frank Coro, Ernst-August Seyfarth, Wolfgang A Nässig.   

Abstract

Sensitive hearing organs often employ nonlinear mechanical sound processing which produces distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Such emissions are also recorded from insect tympanal organs. Here we report high frequency distortion-product emissions, evoked by stimulus frequencies up to 95 kHz, from the tympanal organ of a notodontid moth, Ptilodon cucullina, which contains only a single auditory receptor neuron. The 2f1-f2 distortion-product emission reaches sound levels above 40 dB SPL. Most emission growth functions show a prominent notch of 20 dB depth (n = 20 trials), accompanied by an average phase shift of 119 degrees , at stimulus levels between 60 and 70 dB SPL, which separates a low- and a high-level component. The emissions are vulnerable to topical application of ethyl ether which shifts growth functions by about 20 dB towards higher stimulus levels. For the mammalian cochlea, Lukashkin and colleagues have proposed that distinct level-dependent components of nonlinear amplification do not necessarily require interaction of several cellular sources but could be due to a single nonlinear source. In notodontids, such a physiologically vulnerable source could be the single receptor cell. Potential contributions from accessory cells to the nonlinear properties of the scolopidial hearing organ are still unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572898     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0244-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  27 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals.

Authors:  G A Manley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Specification of auditory sensitivity by Drosophila TRP channels.

Authors:  Martin C Göpfert; Jörg T Albert; B Nadrowski; A Kamikouchi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Fine structure of the noctuid moth ear. I. The transducer area and connections to the tympanic membrane in Feltia subgothica Haworth.

Authors:  H Ghiradella
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection.

Authors:  D M Mills; E W Rubel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses.

Authors:  A M Brown; S A Gaskill
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Development of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  D M Mills; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Prestin, a new type of motor protein.

Authors:  Peter Dallos; Bernd Fakler
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Motion generation by Drosophila mechanosensory neurons.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Power gain exhibited by motile mechanosensory neurons in Drosophila ears.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; A D L Humphris; J T Albert; D Robert; O Hendrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Authors:  Manfred Kössl; Doreen Möckel; Melanie Weber; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Mechanical basis of otoacoustic emissions in tympanal hearing organs.

Authors:  Doreen Möckel; Manuela Nowotny; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Otoacoustic emissions in bushcricket ears: general characteristics and the influence of the neuroactive insecticide pymetrozine.

Authors:  Doreen Möckel; Ernst-August Seyfarth; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.