Literature DB >> 17568489

Does patient perception of alignment affect total knee arthroplasty outcome?

Rajiv Gandhi1, Justin de Beer, Danielle Petruccelli, Mitchell Winemaker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to address a recurring observation in our centre that, despite a satisfactory postoperative radiographic limb alignment, some patients are dissatisfied with the alignment and appearance of their operated leg. We carried out a prospective survey to determine patient perception of limb alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and whether level of satisfaction with alignment affects clinical outcome.
METHODS: Patients self-rated their alignment, their satisfaction with alignment and their level of knee pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Additional outcome measures included pre- and postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Health Survey Short Form (SF-12).
RESULTS: Twenty of 87 (23%) patients were dissatisfied with their new leg alignment and had a poorer perception of pain and range of motion after TKA. Despite this finding, KSS and OKS were no different between patients who were satisfied and those who were dissatisfied with their limb alignment. The SF-12 showed a trend toward lower scores in patients who were dissatisfied with their limb alignment.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with perceived limb alignment appears to influence outcome after TKA and is not reflected in current outcome scales. Perhaps patients should be counselled on how alignment is restored and on what to expect of their limb alignment and appearance after TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17568489      PMCID: PMC2384287     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  19 in total

1.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

2.  Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis.

Authors:  P A Schai; T S Thornhill; R D Scott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-09

3.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

4.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results.

Authors:  G S Gill; A B Joshi; D M Mills
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  O Robertsson; M J Dunbar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Correlation of patient questionnaire responses and physician history in grading clinical outcome following hip and knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of 201 joint arthroplasties.

Authors:  B J McGrory; B F Morrey; J A Rand; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; F Dorey; P Shekelle; L Schumacher; B J Thomas; D J Kilgus; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75.

Authors:  J G Anderson; R L Wixson; D Tsai; S D Stulberg; R W Chang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  3 in total

1.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Patients still wish for key improvements after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seok Jin Kim; Ankur Bamne; Young Dong Song; Yeon Gwi Kang; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-02

3.  Partial or total knee replacement? Identifying patients' information needs on knee replacement surgery: a qualitative study to inform a decision aid.

Authors:  Stephanie Smith; Abtin Alvand; Louise Locock; Sara Ryan; James Smith; Lee Bayliss; Hannah Wilson; Andrew Price
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.