Literature DB >> 32936717

Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

William J Talkington1, Jeremy Donai2, Alexandra S Kadner1, Molly L Layne1, Andrew Forino1, Sijin Wen3, Si Gao3, Margeaux M Gray4, Alexandria J Ashraf4, Gabriela N Valencia1, Brandon D Smith4, Stephanie K Khoo4, Stephen J Gray1, Norman Lass2, Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis1, Susannah Engdahl1, David Graham5, Chris A Frum1, James W Lewis1.   

Abstract

Purpose From an anthropological perspective of hominin communication, the human auditory system likely evolved to enable special sensitivity to sounds produced by the vocal tracts of human conspecifics whether attended or passively heard. While numerous electrophysiological studies have used stereotypical human-produced verbal (speech voice and singing voice) and nonverbal vocalizations to identify human voice-sensitive responses, controversy remains as to when (and where) processing of acoustic signal attributes characteristic of "human voiceness" per se initiate in the brain. Method To explore this, we used animal vocalizations and human-mimicked versions of those calls ("mimic voice") to examine late auditory evoked potential responses in humans. Results Here, we revealed an N1b component (96-120 ms poststimulus) during a nonattending listening condition showing significantly greater magnitude in response to mimics, beginning as early as primary auditory cortices, preceding the time window reported in previous studies that revealed species-specific vocalization processing initiating in the range of 147-219 ms. During a sound discrimination task, a P600 (500-700 ms poststimulus) component showed specificity for accurate discrimination of human mimic voice. Distinct acoustic signal attributes and features of the stimuli were used in a classifier model, which could distinguish most human from animal voice comparably to behavioral data-though none of these single features could adequately distinguish human voiceness. Conclusions These results provide novel ideas for algorithms used in neuromimetic hearing aids, as well as direct electrophysiological support for a neurocognitive model of natural sound processing that informs both neurodevelopmental and anthropological models regarding the establishment of auditory communication systems in humans. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12903839.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32936717      PMCID: PMC8060013          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  87 in total

1.  Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee; C Ponton; B Otis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Local field potentials and spiking activity in the primary auditory cortex in response to social calls.

Authors:  Andrei V Medvedev; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Ursula Kirmse; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects.

Authors:  H J Michalewski; D K Prasher; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-01

5.  Listeners' identification of human-imitated animal sounds.

Authors:  N J Lass; S K Eastham; T L Wright; A R Hinzman; K J Mills; A L Hefferin
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1983-12

Review 6.  The perceptual significance of high-frequency energy in the human voice.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Eric J Hunter; Andrew J Lotto; Brad H Story
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-16

7.  Processing of harmonics in the lateral belt of macaque auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yukiko Kikuchi; Barry Horwitz; Mortimer Mishkin; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The human voice areas: Spatial organization and inter-individual variability in temporal and extra-temporal cortices.

Authors:  Cyril R Pernet; Phil McAleer; Marianne Latinus; Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Ian Charest; Patricia E G Bestelmeyer; Rebecca H Watson; David Fleming; Frances Crabbe; Mitchell Valdes-Sosa; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Auditory object salience: human cortical processing of non-biological action sounds and their acoustic signal attributes.

Authors:  James W Lewis; William J Talkington; Katherine C Tallaksen; Chris A Frum
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09

10.  Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.081

View more
  1 in total

1.  Chinese-English bilinguals show linguistic-perceptual links in the brain associating short spoken phrases with corresponding real-world natural action sounds by semantic category.

Authors:  Gabriela N Valencia; Stephanie Khoo; Ting Wong; Joseph Ta; Bob Hou; Lawrence W Barsalou; Kirk Hazen; Huey Hannah Lin; Shuo Wang; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.331

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.