Literature DB >> 17555248

Monte carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator.

E Sterpin1, M Tomsej, B De Smedt, N Reynaert, S Vynckier.   

Abstract

The Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) is a new pencil beam convolution/superposition algorithm proposed by Varian for photon dose calculations. The configuration of AAA depends on linear accelerator design and specifications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of AAA for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator for small fields and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments in inhomogeneous media. The accuracy of AAA was evaluated in two studies. First, AAA was compared both with Monte Carlo (MC) and the measurements in an inhomogeneous phantom simulating lung equivalent tissues and bone ribs. The algorithm was tested under lateral electronic disequilibrium conditions, using small fields (2 x 2 cm(2)). Good agreement was generally achieved for depth dose and profiles, with deviations generally below 3% in lung inhomogeneities and below 5% at interfaces. However, the effects of attenuation and scattering close to the bone ribs were not fully taken into account by AAA, and small inhomogeneities may lead to planning errors. Second, AAA and MC were compared for IMRT plans in clinical conditions, i.e., dose calculations in a computed tomography scan of a patient. One ethmoid tumor, one orophaxynx and two lung tumors are presented in this paper. Small differences were found between the dose volume histograms. For instance, a 1.7% difference for the mean planning target volume dose was obtained for the ethmoid case. Since better agreement was achieved for the same plans but in homogeneous conditions, these differences must be attributed to the handling of inhomogeneities by AAA. Therefore, inherent assumptions of the algorithm, principally the assumption of independent depth and lateral directions in the scaling of the kernels, were slightly influencing AAA's validity in inhomogeneities. However, AAA showed a good accuracy overall and a great ability to handle small fields in inhomogeneous media compared to other pencil beam convolution algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17555248     DOI: 10.1118/1.2727314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Dosimetric verification of the anisotropic analytical algorithm in lung equivalent heterogeneities with and without bone equivalent heterogeneities.

Authors:  Kaoru Ono; Satoru Endo; Kenichi Tanaka; Masaharu Hoshi; Yutaka Hirokawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A quality assurance method that utilizes 3D dosimetry and facilitates clinical interpretation.

Authors:  Mark Oldham; Andrew Thomas; Jennifer O'Daniel; Titania Juang; Geoffrey Ibbott; John Adamovics; John P Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Three-dimensional gamma analysis of dose distributions in individual structures for IMRT dose verification.

Authors:  Yuuki Tomiyama; Fujio Araki; Takeshi Oono; Kazunari Hioki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-05-06

5.  ARCHERRT - a GPU-based and photon-electron coupled Monte Carlo dose computing engine for radiation therapy: software development and application to helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Lin Su; Youming Yang; Bryan Bednarz; Edmond Sterpin; Xining Du; Tianyu Liu; Wei Ji; X George Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center's head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Tao Han; Firas Mourtada; Kelly Kisling; Justin Mikell; David Followill; Rebecca Howell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport method with Monte Carlo and model-based convolution methods in heterogeneous media.

Authors:  Tao Han; Justin K Mikell; Mohammad Salehpour; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for virtual heterogeneous phantoms and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the head and neck.

Authors:  Ryota Onizuka; Fujio Araki; Takeshi Ohno; Yuji Nakaguchi; Yudai Kai; Yuuki Tomiyama; Kazunari Hioki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-01

9.  Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport algorithm for heterogeneous dose calculation in lung cancer.

Authors:  Tao Han; David Followill; Justin Mikell; Roman Repchak; Andrea Molineu; Rebecca Howell; Mohammad Salehpour; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Monte Carlo commissioning of radiotherapy LINAC-Introducing an improved methodology.

Authors:  Saqib Bajwa; Attia Gul; Shahbaz Ahmed; Muhammad B Kakakhel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.