Literature DB >> 17551711

Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: fixed or mobile bearing?

M C Forster1, A J Bauze, G C R Keene.   

Abstract

Between May 2001 and May 2003, 233 consecutive Preservation unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) were performed. Of these, 30 were lateral UKRs (13%) performed in 12 men and 16 women (2 bilateral cases) with a mean age of 67 years (range 36-93 years). A metal-backed mobile bearing tibial component was used in 13 knees and an all-polyethylene fixed bearing tibial component in 17 knees. The patients were reviewed prospectively at 1 and 2 years. The 2 year results show no difference in range of motion or function between the mobile and fixed bearing versions of the Preservation knee when used on the lateral side. There were three early revisions, all in the mobile bearing group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17551711     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0345-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  17 in total

1.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J H Newman; R L Evans; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

2.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an intermediate report of survivorship after the introduction of a new system with analysis of failures.

Authors:  Parminder J S Jeer; Gregory C R Keene; Paul Gill
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study.

Authors:  R E Gleeson; R Evans; C E Ackroyd; J Webb; J H Newman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis.

Authors:  J H Newman; C E Ackroyd; N A Shah
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-09

5.  New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Lateral compartment arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; S Snow; C Cooper; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Single photon emission computed tomography in planning unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective study examining the association between scan findings and intraoperative assessment of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Parminder J S Jeer; Christopher C Mahr; Gregory C R Keene; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation.

Authors:  H M McEwen; J Fisher; A A Goldsmith; D D Auger; C Hardaker; M H Stone
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Trabecular bone strength at the knee.

Authors:  I Hvid
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bearing design influences short- to mid-term survivorship, but not functional outcomes following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Laura J Kleeblad; Inger N Sierevelt; Wieger G Horstmann; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Restoration of normal knee kinematics with respect to tibial insert design in mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty using computational simulation.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Jin-Ah Lee; Hyun-Seok Chung; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 4.  Mobile Bearing versus Fixed Bearing for Unicompartmental Arthroplasty in Monocompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Karen Elsner; Frank Hildebrand; Jörg Eschweiler; Arne Driessen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Unicompartmental knee resurfacing: enlarged tibio-femoral contact area and reduced contact stress using novel patient-derived geometries.

Authors:  Nick Steklov; John Slamin; Sudesh Srivastav; Darryl D'Lima
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2010-03-12

6.  The risk of bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a mobile biconcave design.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Schelfaut; Lucas Beckers; Peter Verdonk; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacements: early results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  Ben Marson; Narayana Prasad; Ruth Jenkins; Mark Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-07-11

Review 8.  Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Tjeerd Jager; Matthew S Dooley; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.