Literature DB >> 22926671

The risk of bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a mobile biconcave design.

Sebastiaan Schelfaut1, Lucas Beckers, Peter Verdonk, Johan Bellemans, Jan Victor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A safety study was conducted on a cohort of 25 patients who underwent lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with a biconcave mobile-bearing insert.
METHODS: The first 25 lateral mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements, performed in a general hospital by one surgeon, were prospectively reviewed, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
RESULTS: One bearing dislocation occurred 4 months postsurgery. The Oxford knee score improved in all patients from a preoperative mean of 23.3 (range 8-40, SD 8.4) to a postoperative mean of 42.1 (range 23-48, SD 6.7). General patient satisfaction at a mean follow-up of 20 months was excellent in 84 %, good in 12 % and fair in 4 %. The mechanical axis as a measure on full-leg standing radiographs improved from 5.7° valgus (range 1°-16°, SD 4.1°) to 1.7° valgus (7° to -3°, SD 2.1°). Mechanical alignment correction averaged 4.0° (range -1° to 15°, SD 3.9°).
CONCLUSION: The mobile biconcave insert design in the lateral unicompartmental knee replacement seems appropriate as a innovative, anatomy imitating solution, resulting in a good clinical outcome. Still, bearing dislocation remains a concern, especially in extended indication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926671     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2171-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J H Newman; R L Evans; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

3.  Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment.

Authors:  B J Robinson; J L Rees; A J Price; D J Beard; D W Murray; P McLardy Smith; C A F Dodd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07

4.  A kinematic study of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J Robinson; J L Rees; A J Price; D J Beard; D M Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Mobile- versus fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard D Scott
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2010

6.  The flexion gap in normal knees. An MRI study.

Authors:  Y Tokuhara; Y Kadoya; S Nakagawa; A Kobayashi; K Takaoka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-11

7.  What should the surgeon aim for when performing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Geert Van Damme; Koen Defoort; Yves Ducoulombier; Francis Van Glabbeek; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Mobile bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H Pandit; C Jenkins; D J Beard; A J Price; H S Gill; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings.

Authors:  B J L Kendrick; D Longino; H Pandit; U Svard; H S Gill; C A F Dodd; D W Murray; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

10.  The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Luc Labey; Pius Wong; Bernardo Innocenti; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  7 in total

1.  Bearing design influences short- to mid-term survivorship, but not functional outcomes following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Laura J Kleeblad; Inger N Sierevelt; Wieger G Horstmann; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Experiences with lateral unicondylar prostheses].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; T Walker; T Gotterbarm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - a challenge].

Authors:  T Walker; P R Aldinger; M R Streit; T Gotterbarm
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a systematic review of reasons for failure.

Authors:  Lukas Ernstbrunner; Mohamed A Imam; Octavian Andronic; Tabea Perz; Karl Wieser; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Total versus unicompartmental knee replacement for isolated lateral osteoarthritis: a matched-pairs study.

Authors:  Tilman Walker; Tobias Gotterbarm; Thomas Bruckner; Christian Merle; Marcus R Streit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Change of gait in patients with lateral osteoarthritis of the knee after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Seeger; J P Schikschneit; C Schuld; R Rupp; S Jäger; H Schmitt; G S Maier; M Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement implant: Increasing wall height reduces the risk of bearing dislocation.

Authors:  Irene Yang; Jonathan D Gammell; David W Murray; Stephen J Mellon
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.617

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.