Literature DB >> 17549525

Development of a clinical diagnosis support tool to identify patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Shinichi Konno1, Yasuaki Hayashino, Shunichi Fukuhara, Shinichi Kikuchi, Kiyoshi Kaneda, Atsushi Seichi, Kazuhiro Chiba, Kazuhiko Satomi, Kensei Nagata, Shinya Kawai.   

Abstract

No clinical diagnostic support tool can help identify patients with LSS. Simple diagnostic tool may improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of LSS. The aim of this study was to develop a simple clinical diagnostic tool that may help physicians to diagnose LSS in patients with lower leg symptoms. Patients with pain or numbness of the lower legs were prospectively enrolled. The diagnosis of LSS by experienced orthopedic specialists was the outcome measure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors that predicted LSS; a simple clinical prediction rule was developed by assigning a risk score to each item based on the estimated beta-coefficients. From December 2002 to December 2004, 104 orthopedic physicians from 22 clinics and 50 hospitals evaluated 468 patients. Two items of physical examination, three items of patients' symptom, and five items of physical examination were included in the final scoring system as a result of multiple logistic regression analysis. The sum of the risk scores for each patient ranged from -2 to 16. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was 11.30 (P = 0.1851); the area under the ROC curve was 0.918. The clinical diagnostic support tool had a sensitivity of 92.8% and a specificity of 72.0%. The prevalence of LSS was 6.3% in the bottom quartile of the risk score (-2 to 5) and 99.0% in the top quartile (12 to 16). We developed a simple clinical diagnostic support tool to identify patients with LSS. Further studies are needed to validate this tool in primary care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549525      PMCID: PMC2223350          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0402-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  An absent pulse is not sensitive for the early detection of peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Tracie C Collins; Maria Suarez-Almazor; Nancy J Peterson
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Irene de Graaf; Anneloes Prak; Sita Bierma-Zeinstra; Siep Thomas; Wilco Peul; Bart Koes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Classification criteria revisited.

Authors:  J N Katz; M H Liang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1991-10

4.  Pharmacokinetics of glibenclamide and its metabolites in diabetic patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  A Jönsson; T Rydberg; G Sterner; A Melander
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features.

Authors:  T Amundsen; H Weber; F Lilleås; H J Nordal; M Abdelnoor; B Magnaes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Spinal stenosis. A common cause of podiatric symptoms.

Authors:  S M Goldman; J D Funk; V M Christensen
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1997-03

9.  Associations between patient report of symptoms and anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P F Beattie; S P Meyers; P Stratford; R W Millard; G M Hollenberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Contribution of neuromuscular impairment to physical functional status in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  G Stucki; M H Liang; S J Lipson; A H Fossel; J N Katz
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  30 in total

1.  Diagnosis of a 64-year-old patient presenting with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based case report.

Authors:  Peter C Emary
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-03

2.  Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

Authors:  Rachel A Moses; Wenyan Zhao; Lukas P Staub; Markus Melloh; Thomas Barz; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign, a radiological sign using magnetic resonance imaging, for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Peigen Xie; Wei Zhang; Yang Yang; Limin Rong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and psychosocial factors: a multicenter cross-sectional study (DISTO project).

Authors:  Miho Sekiguchi; Koji Yonemoto; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Takuya Nikaido; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Kinshi Kato; Koji Otani; Shoji Yabuki; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Role of the Self-Administered, Self-Reported History Questionnaire to Identify Types of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Sensitivity Analysis.

Authors:  Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Parisa Azimi; Sohrab Shahzadi; Shirzad Azhari; Hassan Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

Review 6.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

7.  Epidemiology and associated radiographic spinopelvic parameters of symptomatic degenerative lumbar scoliosis: are radiographic spinopelvic parameters associated with the presence of symptoms or decreased quality of life in degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

Authors:  Yoichi Iizuka; Haku Iizuka; Tokue Mieda; Tsuyoshi Tajika; Atsushi Yamamoto; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Relationship between patient-based scoring systems and the activity level of patients measured by wearable activity trackers in lumbar spine disease.

Authors:  Masahiro Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuki Fujimoto; Yasuhiro Shiga; Hirohito Kanamoto; Koki Abe; Hideyuki Kinoshita; Masaki Norimoto; Tomotaka Umimura; Takashi Sato; Masashi Sato; Masahiro Suzuki; Keigo Enomoto; Yawara Eguchi; Yasuchika Aoki; Tsutomu Akazawa; Yohei Kawasaki; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 10.  Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; James Rainville; Leonid Kalichman; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.