Literature DB >> 21156951

Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?

Pradeep Suri1, James Rainville, Leonid Kalichman, Jeffrey N Katz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common diagnosis in older adults presenting with lower extremity pain.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the accuracy of the clinical examination for the diagnosis of the clinical syndrome of LSS. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL searches of articles published from January 1966 to September 2010. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they contained adequate data on the accuracy of the history and physical examination for diagnosing the clinical syndrome of LSS, using a reference standard of expert opinion with radiographic or anatomic confirmation. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed each study to determine eligibility, extract data, and appraise levels of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four studies evaluating 741 patients were identified. Among patients with lower extremity pain, the likelihood of the clinical syndrome of LSS was increased for individuals older than 70 years (likelihood ratio [LR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.5), and was decreased for those younger than 60 years (LR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57). The most useful symptoms for increasing the likelihood of the clinical syndrome of LSS were having no pain when seated (LR, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.9-30), improvement of symptoms when bending forward (LR, 6.4; 95% CI, 4.1-9.9), the presence of bilateral buttock or leg pain (LR, 6.3; 95% CI, 3.1-13), and neurogenic claudication (LR, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.9-4.8). Absence of neurogenic claudication (LR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17-0.31) decreased the likelihood of the diagnosis. A wide-based gait (LR, 13; 95% CI, 1.9-95) and abnormal Romberg test result (LR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.4-13) increased the likelihood of the clinical syndrome of LSS. A score of 7 or higher on a diagnostic support tool including history and examination findings increased the likelihood of the clinical syndrome of LSS (LR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.7-4.0), while a score lower than 7 made the diagnosis much less likely (LR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of the clinical syndrome of LSS requires the appropriate clinical picture and radiographic findings. Absence of pain when seated and improvement of symptoms when bending forward are the most useful individual findings. Combinations of findings are most useful for identifying patients who are unlikely to have the diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21156951      PMCID: PMC3260477          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  38 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily Blood; Brett Hanscom; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Christy C Tomkins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Validation study of a clinical diagnosis support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Kato; Toshifumi Kawakami; Masao Kifune; Tetsuro Kishimoto; Kimio Nibu; Hirotsugu Oda; Kenzo Shirasawa; Toshikatsu Tominaga; Koichiro Toyoda; Kazunari Tsue; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 5.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 6.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; Robert Cole; David H Kim; Ling Li; Pradeep Suri; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain.

Authors:  Nicholas Henschke; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge; Robert D Herbert; Robert G Cumming; Jane Bleasel; John York; Anurina Das; James H McAuley
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-10

9.  Associations of back and leg pain with health status and functional capacity of older adults: findings from the retirement community back pain study.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Jean M Gaines; Michelle Shardell; Eleanor M Simonsick
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-09-15

10.  Predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Takashi Sugioka; Yasuaki Hayashino; Shinichi Konno; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  62 in total

1.  Diagnosis of a 64-year-old patient presenting with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based case report.

Authors:  Peter C Emary
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-03

2.  An evidence-based diagnostic classification system for low back pain.

Authors:  Robert Vining; Eric Potocki; Michael Seidman; A Paige Morgenthal
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2013-09

3.  Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Long Chen; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and its imposters: three case studies.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Kent Stuber; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Michael Schneider; Y Raja Rampersaud; Andrea D Furlan; Carol A Kennedy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

Review 7.  Osteoarthritis of the spine: the facet joints.

Authors:  Alfred C Gellhorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Pradeep Suri
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options.

Authors:  Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald; Albrecht Waschke; Lars Gobisch; Christof Hopf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  The reliability of differentiating neurogenic claudication from vascular claudication based on symptomatic presentation.

Authors:  Mélissa Nadeau; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; David C Taylor; Ruby Grewal; D Kirk Lawlor; Chris S Bailey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Reliability of the clinical examination in the diagnosis of neurogenic versus vascular claudication.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Paul Park; Peter K Henke; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Juan Valdivia; Sierra Loar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.