Literature DB >> 1754612

Trends in diagnostic ultrasound exposure.

F A Duck1, K Martin.   

Abstract

Trends in exposure for diagnostic ultrasonic equipment and a contemporary survey of exposure values are presented. It is demonstrated that both time-averaged intensities and peak pressures have increased steadily over the last two decades. Currently available diagnostic equipment generates pulses for which the average worst-case rarefaction pressure, p-, is about 2 MPa in water, irrespective of the mode of operation. Overall the highest values of p- are found in short-focus beams. Average spatial-peak time-averaged intensities, I(SPTA), are greatest for pulsed Doppler operation at a little over 1 W cm-2. M-mode and colour Doppler operation have average values of I(SPTA) of about 100 mW cm-2 and imaging operates at about an order of magnitude lower again. Vaginal transducers differ little in operational exposure from other transducers. Exposure measurement on colour Doppler systems demands a knowledge of the effect of scanner controls on the field, and some details are given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1754612     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/36/11/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations.

Authors:  Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Survey of current practice in clinical transvaginal ultrasound scanning in the UK.

Authors:  Eleanor Martin; Adam Shaw; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 8.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

9.  Effects of 2D-Shear Wave Elastography on Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in the Brains of Neonatal Mice and Exploration of the Mechanism.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Junlai Li; Changtian Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-30

10.  Prenatal ultrasound and the risk of childhood brain tumour and its subtypes.

Authors:  K Stålberg; B Haglund; O Axelsson; S Cnattingius; S Pfeifer; H Kieler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.