Literature DB >> 17541724

Adenosine stress first pass perfusion for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis: a feasibility study.

Christof Burgstahler1, Markus Kunze, Meinrad P Gawaz, Volker Rasche, Jochen Wöhrle, Vinzenz Hombach, Nico Merkle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using adenosine stress first pass perfusion in patients with aortic stenosis in comparison with invasive angiography. Twenty-three consecutive patients (15 male, mean age 68 +/- 12 years) with relevant aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.90 +/- 0.41 cm(2)) were examined by MRI (1.5 T, Philips Intera CV). Contrast-enhanced first pass perfusion was performed with adenosine stress (140 microg/kg/min) and under rest conditions. The results were compared with invasive coronary angiography with regard to the presence of a relevant coronary artery stenosis (>70%). Three of 23 patients (13%) had contraindications for adenosine administration (one patient with atrioventricular block, two patients with mild claustrophobia). In the remaining 20 patients, adenosine stress perfusion could be performed without any complications. CAD was correctly detected in eight patients and correctly ruled out in 10 of 12 patients. False-positive results were seen in two patients with severe myocardial hypertrophy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 80%, 83%, and 100%, respectively. Adenosine stress perfusion can be performed without complications even in patients with high grade aortic stenosis. MRI is helpful to detect and rule out significant CAD in these patients. Severe myocardial hypertrophy may lead to false-positive results. Our initial results indicate that due to a high negative predictive value pre-operative invasive coronary angiography might probably be waived in patients without perfusion defects in stress MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17541724     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-007-9236-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  19 in total

1.  [Perfusion MR imaging of the heart with TrueFISP].

Authors:  W G Schreiber; M Schmitt; P Kalden; G Horstick; T Gumbrich; S Petersen; O Mohrs; K F Kreitner; T Voigtländer; M Thelen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-03

2.  Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients.

Authors:  F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Evaluation and management of patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Blase A Carabello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Regional myocardial blood flow during exercise in dogs with chronic left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  R J Bache; T R Vrobel; W S Ring; R W Emery; R W Andersen
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly.

Authors:  A M Iivanainen; M Lindroos; R Tilvis; J Heikkilä; M Kupari
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  [Risk of invasive diagnosis with retrograde catheterization of the left ventricle in patients with acquired aortic valve stenosis].

Authors:  B Bartsch; K K Haase; W Voelker; W A Schöbel; K R Karsch
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1999-04

7.  Aortic valve replacement and coronary artery surgery: determinants affecting early and long-term results.

Authors:  P Stassano; L Di Tommaso; D F Vitale; M Monaco; G Iannelli; M Mottola; A Musumeci; N Spampinato
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Shelton D Caruthers; Shiow Jiuan Lin; Peggy Brown; Mary P Watkins; Todd A Williams; Katherine A Lehr; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample.

Authors:  M Lindroos; M Kupari; J Heikkilä; R Tilvis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention.

Authors:  O Lund
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  8 in total

1.  The use of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging in severe aortic stenosis: Is it time for a new prospective study?

Authors:  Ioannis Parastatidis; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  An assessment of the safety, hemodynamic response, and diagnostic accuracy of commonly used vasodilator stressors in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Waseem Chaudhry; Alan W Ahlberg; Richard S Amara; Ahmed Elfar; Matthew W Parker; John A Savino; Ruwanthi Titano; Milena J Henzlova; William L Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Jayanth R Arnold; Tammy J Pegg; Adrian S H Cheng; William J van Gaal; Jane M Francis; Adrian P Banning; Stefan Neubauer; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Coronary Assessment and Revascularization Before Transcutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation: An Update on Current Knowledge.

Authors:  Muhammad Sabbah; Thomas Engstrøm; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard; Jacob Lønborg
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 8.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.