Literature DB >> 19037746

Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Theodoros D Karamitsos1, Jayanth R Arnold, Tammy J Pegg, Adrian S H Cheng, William J van Gaal, Jane M Francis, Adrian P Banning, Stefan Neubauer, Joseph B Selvanayagam.   

Abstract

We sought to assess the tolerance and safety of adenosine-stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We retrospectively examined all adenosine CMR perfusion scans performed in our centre in patients with known or suspected (CAD) and normal volunteers at either 1.5 or 3 T. All subjects were initially screened for contraindications to adenosine. The dose of adenosine infused was 140 microg/kg/min. Significant CAD was defined angiographically as the presence of at least one stenosis of >50% diameter. Data were collected from 351 consecutive subjects (mean age 62 +/- 11 years, range 25-85 years-245 men). Of the 351 subjects, 305 had a coronary angiogram, the remaining 46 subjects were normal volunteers studied for research protocols. In total, 233 subjects (76%) were found to have significant CAD of whom 128 had multi-vessel disease. There were no deaths, myocardial infarctions, or episodes of bronchospasm during the CMR study. Transient 2nd (Mobitz II) or 3rd-degree atrioventricular (AV) block occurred in 27 patients (8%). There were no sustained episodes of advanced AV block. Transient chest pain was the most common side effect (199 subjects-57%). The use of intravenous adenosine in CMR perfusion imaging is safe and well-tolerated, even in patients with severe CAD. Where a careful screening policy for contraindications to adenosine is followed, serious adverse events in the CMR scanner are relatively rare and symptoms resolve following termination of the infusion, without the need for aminophylline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19037746     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-008-9392-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

1.  Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.

Authors:  Igor Klem; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Michael H Sketch; Victor Behar; Jonathan Weinsaft; Peter Cawley; Michele Parker; Michael Elliott; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Is the dyspnea during adenosine cardiac stress test caused by bronchospasm?

Authors:  K K Balan; M Critchley
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Safety of adenosine stress magnetic resonance imaging using a mobile cardiac magnetic resonance system.

Authors:  Peter Bernhardt; Michael Steffens; Klaus Kleinertz; Roland Morell; Rainer Budde; Roman Leischik; Alfred Krämer; Ulrich Overhoff; Oliver Strohm
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Detection of cardiac small vessel disease by adenosine-stress magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Peter Bernhardt; Benny Levenson; Alexander Albrecht; Thomas Engels; Oliver Strohm
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J P Greenwood; J F Younger; J P Ridgway; M U Sivananthan; S G Ball; S Plein
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.

Authors:  M D Cerqueira; M S Verani; M Schwaiger; J Heo; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Albert C van Rossum; Massimo Lombardi; Nidal Al-Saadi; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Henrik B W Larsson; Scott D Flamm; Moritz Marquardt; Lars Johansson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  The safety and tolerability of adenosine in patients with obstructive airways disease.

Authors:  William J van Gaal; B Couthino; M Chan; K C Allman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 9.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla.

Authors:  Adrian S H Cheng; Tammy J Pegg; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Nick Searle; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Robin P Choudhury; Adrian P Banning; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  18 in total

1.  Pharmacological stress: a useful exercise?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Cardiac purinergic signalling in health and disease.

Authors:  Geoffrey Burnstock; Amir Pelleg
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 4.  Pharmacological stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Identification of left ventricular myocardial ischemia and cardiac prognosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: updates from 2008 to 2010.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  [Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: importance in coronary artery disease].

Authors:  M Neizel-Wittke; M Kelm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Prevalence of cardiomyopathy in asymptomatic patients with left bundle branch block referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Masliza Mahmod; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Joseph J Suttie; Saul G Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Jane M Francis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance-observation unit management of patients at intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome: a possible strategy for reducing healthcare-related costs.

Authors:  Michael E Hall; Chadwick D Miller; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-02

9.  The adverse events and hemodynamic effects of adenosine-based cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Voigtländer; Axel Schmermund; Peter Bramlage; Amelie Elsässer; Annett Magedanz; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Oliver K Mohrs
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Jane M Francis; Cameron J Holloway; Saul G Myerson; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.