PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the setup accuracy for patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients undergoing radiotherapy via tangent (TG), supraclavicular-axillary (SA), and internal mammary (IM) fields were included. To explore the setup accuracy, distances between chosen landmarks were taken as reference parameters (RPs). The difference between measured RPs on simulation films and electronic portal images (EPIs) was calculated as the setup error. RESULTS: A total of 30 simulation films and 120 EPIs were evaluated. In the SA field, calculated RPs were lung length (LL), clavicle-field center perpendicular distance, and clavicle-field center transverse distance. The mean of the standard deviations (SDs) of the random errors (sigma) for these parameters were 4.7, 7.3, and 7.6; and the SDs of the systematic errors (Sigma) were 6.8, 4.4, and 13.5, respectively. In the TG fields, the calculated RPs were the central lung distance (CLD), maximum lung distance (MLD), and central soft-tissue distance (CSTD). In the medial TG field, the sigma values for these parameters were 3.4, 3.6, and 4.1, respectively; and the sigma values were 6.6, 2.6, and 3.4, respectively. In the lateral TG field, Sigma values for the calculated RPs were 2.4, 3.2, and 3.3l, respectively; and the Sigma values were 5.6, 3.6, and 4.8, respectively. CONCLUSION: CLD, MLD, and CSTD in TG fields and LL in SA fields are easily identifiable and are helpful for detecting setup errors using EPIs in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the setup accuracy for patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients undergoing radiotherapy via tangent (TG), supraclavicular-axillary (SA), and internal mammary (IM) fields were included. To explore the setup accuracy, distances between chosen landmarks were taken as reference parameters (RPs). The difference between measured RPs on simulation films and electronic portal images (EPIs) was calculated as the setup error. RESULTS: A total of 30 simulation films and 120 EPIs were evaluated. In the SA field, calculated RPs were lung length (LL), clavicle-field center perpendicular distance, and clavicle-field center transverse distance. The mean of the standard deviations (SDs) of the random errors (sigma) for these parameters were 4.7, 7.3, and 7.6; and the SDs of the systematic errors (Sigma) were 6.8, 4.4, and 13.5, respectively. In the TG fields, the calculated RPs were the central lung distance (CLD), maximum lung distance (MLD), and central soft-tissue distance (CSTD). In the medial TG field, the sigma values for these parameters were 3.4, 3.6, and 4.1, respectively; and the sigma values were 6.6, 2.6, and 3.4, respectively. In the lateral TG field, Sigma values for the calculated RPs were 2.4, 3.2, and 3.3l, respectively; and the Sigma values were 5.6, 3.6, and 4.8, respectively. CONCLUSION: CLD, MLD, and CSTD in TG fields and LL in SA fields are easily identifiable and are helpful for detecting setup errors using EPIs in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Authors: A Aref; D Thornton; E Youssef; T He; S Tekyi-Mensah; L Denton; G Ezzell Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Overgaard; P S Hansen; J Overgaard; C Rose; M Andersson; F Bach; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; H T Mouridsen; M B Jensen; K Zedeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-10-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Fiona J Gilbert; Antoinne K Ah-See; Oleg Eremin; Leslie G Walker; Tarun K Sarkar; S Peter Eggleton; Keith N Ogston Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J L Misset; M di Palma; M Delgado; R Plagne; P Chollet; P Fumoleau; B Le Mevel; D Belpomme; J Guerrin; P Fargeot; R Metz; M Ithzaki; C Hill; G Mathé Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David B Wiant; Stacy Wentworth; Jacqueline M Maurer; Caroline L Vanderstraeten; Jonathon A Terrell; Benjamin J Sintay Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: D Reitz; G Carl; S Schönecker; M Pazos; P Freislederer; M Niyazi; U Ganswindt; F Alongi; M Reiner; C Belka; S Corradini Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 3.481