Literature DB >> 12421061

The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile.

Mary C Potter1, Adrian Staub, Daniel H O'Connor.   

Abstract

Competition for attention between 2 written words was investigated by presenting the words briefly in a single stream of distractors (Experiment 1) or in different streams (Experiment 2-6), using rapid serial visual presentation at 53 ms/item. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was varied from 0 to 213 ms. At all SOAs there was strong competition, but which word was more likely to be reported shifted markedly with SOA. At SOAs in the range of 13-53 ms the second word was more likely to be reported, but at 213 ms, the advantage switched to the first word, as in the attentional blink. A 2-stage competition model of attention is proposed in which attention to a detected target is labile in Stage 1. Stage 1 ends when one target is identified, initiating a serial Stage 2 process of consolidation of that target.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12421061     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  70 in total

1.  Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P E Dux; B Wyble; P Jolicœur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Acute stress reduces the emotional attentional blink: Evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Yuecui Kan; Xuewei Wang; Xitong Chen; Hanxuan Zhao; Jijun Lan; Haijun Duan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Short-term memory and the attentional blink: capacity versus content.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

4.  Visual short-term memory for sequential arrays.

Authors:  Arjun Kumar; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

5.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stefan van der Stigchel; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-08

6.  Bidirectional semantic priming in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Francesca Pesciarelli; Remo Job; Francesca Peressotti; Daniel H O'Connor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

7.  Timing attention: cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Addie Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

8.  The locus of semantic priming in RSVP target search.

Authors:  Jodi L Davenport; Mary C Potter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

Review 9.  How the brain blinks: towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Klaus Kessler; Frank Schmitz; Joachim Gross; Elkan Akyürek; Kimron Shapiro; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

10.  Unmasking the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark R Nieuwenstein; Mary C Potter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.