Literature DB >> 17533516

Postprocedural resistance of the target lesion is a strong predictor of subsequent revascularization: assessment by a novel lesion-specific physiological parameter, the epicardial resistance index.

Kazuhito Suzuki1, Yukio Tsurumi, Yuji Fuda, Yasuhiro Ishii, Atsushi Takagi, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Hiroshi Kasanuki.   

Abstract

Objective evaluation of the functional significance of individual stenosis in patients with multiple lesions is crucial when performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here we propose a novel lesion-specific parameter, the epicardial resistance index (ERI), which is derived from intracoronary pressure measurements, and validate its clinical usefulness. The ERI is defined as the ratio of the resistance of an epicardial coronary stenosis to that of downstream myocardium. After obtaining intracoronary pressure data by pull-back of a 0.014'' pressure wire, the ERI was calculated as the trans-lesional pressure gradient divided by (Pd-Pv) at maximum hyperemia, where Pd = the mean distal coronary pressure in the absence of any stenosis and Pv = the central venous pressure. Using 170 measurements obtained from 75 patients, the correlation of ERI with parameters obtained from quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was studied. ERI showed a significant correlation with the QCA-derived percent diameter stenosis (r = 0.67, P < 0.001), and with the IVUS-derived minimum luminal area (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). In 55 patients who underwent PCI with bare metal stents, a postprocedural target lesion ERI value greater than 0.16 strongly predicted the need for subsequent revascularization within six months (81% sensitivity and 80% specificity). The ERI is a useful pressure-derived hemodynamic parameter that correlates with anatomical parameters. In addition, the postprocedural resistance of the target lesion indicated by the ERI is a reliable predictor of the late outcome of PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533516     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-006-0945-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  22 in total

1.  Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; G R Heyndrickx; D Hodeige; R Kirkeeide; K L Gould
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  A Abizaid; G S Mintz; A D Pichard; K M Kent; L F Satler; C L Walsh; J J Popma; M B Leon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Quantification of the minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary stenting by two- and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound versus edge detection and videodensitometry.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; M J Kutryk; R Gil; Y Ozaki; C Di Mario; J R Roelandt; P J de Feyter; P W Serruys
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Measurement of transstenotic pressure gradient during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  H V Anderson; G S Roubin; P P Leimgruber; W R Cox; J S Douglas; S B King; A R Gruentzig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.

Authors:  J H Reiber; P W Serruys; C J Kooijman; W Wijns; C J Slager; J J Gerbrands; J C Schuurbiers; A den Boer; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Morphological effects of coronary balloon angioplasty in vivo assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  J Honye; D J Mahon; A Jain; C J White; S R Ramee; J B Wallis; A al-Zarka; J M Tobis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease.

Authors:  P P Leimgruber; G S Roubin; J Hollman; G A Cotsonis; B Meier; J S Douglas; S B King; A R Gruentzig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Assessment of coronary artery stenosis pressure gradient by quantitative coronary arteriography in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D Atar; P S Ramanujam; K Saunamäki; S Haunsø
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1994-01

9.  Transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; W J Paulus; P J Vantrimpont; S U Sys; G R Heyndrickx
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Coronary pressure measurement to determine treatment strategy for equivocal left main coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Shunji Suemaru; Kohichiro Iwasaki; Keizo Yamamoto; Shozo Kusachi; Kazuyoshi Hina; Satoshi Hirohata; Minoru Hirota; Masaaki Murakami; Shigeshi Kamikawa; Takashi Murakami; Yasushi Shiratori
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.814

View more
  2 in total

1.  Side-by-side false and true lumen stenting for recanalization of the chronically occluded right coronary artery.

Authors:  Kenan Omurlu; Ozcan Ozeke
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Long-term prognostic value of coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 9-year follow-up results from SZEGED study.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Erika Balázs; Osama I I Soliman; Róbert Sepp; Miklós Csanády; Tamás Forster
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.037

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.