Literature DB >> 1752986

Assessment of Diesse Ves-matic automated system for measuring erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

M Caswell1, J Stuart.   

Abstract

Measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) using a closed tube system reduces the biohazard risk to laboratory staff. The Diesse Ves-matic system offers manual or vacuum collection of blood into plastic tubes, automated mixing of the sample, and automated reading of the end point after 20 minutes of sedimentation. This system was compared with the 1977 Westergren ESR method of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) and with the 1988 ICSH undiluted ESR method. Manually collected Ves-matic samples showed good agreement with ICSH values, although there was a tendency to false low results at low ESR values which may represent dilution of plasma protein with excess citrate. Vacuum collected Ves-matic samples also showed good agreement with ICSH values, although there was a tendency to false high results which may reflect a change in the blood: citrate ratio caused by loss of anticoagulant diluent or vacuum from plastic tubes during storage. The Diesse Ves-matic system incorporates several improvements over previous technology and offers a safer, quicker, and more standardised ESR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1752986      PMCID: PMC496637          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.44.11.946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of tests used to monitor rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  B S Bull; J C Westengard; M Farr; P A Bacon; P J Meyer; J Stuart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  [Evaluation of a totally automated alternative system for determining the rate of erythrocyte sedimentation].

Authors:  M Fernández de Castro; P Fernández Calle; A Viloria; C Larrocha; M C Jiménez
Journal:  Sangre (Barc)       Date:  1989-02

3.  Evaluation of sealed vacuum extraction method (Seditainer) for measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Authors:  W N Patton; P J Meyer; J Stuart
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Evaluation of a totally automatic system for determining the erythrocyte sedimentation rate].

Authors:  J M Jou; M J Insa; M Aymerich; J L Vives Corrons
Journal:  Sangre (Barc)       Date:  1988-12

5.  Review of British National Lymphoma Investigation studies of Hodgkin's disease and development of prognostic index.

Authors:  J L Haybittle; F G Hayhoe; M J Easterling; A M Jelliffe; M H Bennett; G Vaughan Hudson; B Vaughan Hudson; K A MacLennan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of the Wintrobe, the Westergren and the ZSR erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) methods to a candidate reference method.

Authors:  D L Moseley; B S Bull
Journal:  Clin Lab Haematol       Date:  1982

8.  The significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate as a prognostic factor for patients with prostate cancer: Gunma Urological Oncology Study Group investigation.

Authors:  K Imai; T Suzuki; M Kobayashi; H Yamanaka; Y Tomaru; J Sato
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-10
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparative study between the Ves-matic and microerythrocyte sedimentation rate method.

Authors:  Ali Atas; Alpay Cakmak; Mustafa Soran; Himmet Karazeybek
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Comparison of iSED and Ves-Matic Cube 200 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Measurements With Westergren Method.

Authors:  Nihal Boğdaycioğlu; Fatma Meric Yilmaz; Sevilay Sezer; Esra Oğuz
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.