Literature DB >> 10448266

The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life.

M A Sprangers1, A te Velde, N K Aaronson.   

Abstract

The objectives of the current study were to construct a colorectal cancer-specific quality of life (QL) questionnaire module to be used in conjunction with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and to test its reliability and validity in The Netherlands. Module construction took place following the EORTC guidelines for module development. The module--the QLQ-CR38--consists of 38 items covering symptoms and side-effects related to different treatment modalities, body image, sexuality and future perspective. This module was tested among 117 colorectal cancer patients on several occasions. The timing was prior to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, during treatment and 3 months following the second assessment. For purposes of test-retest reliability, a subsample of patients completed the QLQ-CR38 1 week following the third assessment. Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the hypothesised scale structure of the function scales but not of the symptom scales. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for seven of the nine scales exceeded the 0.70 criterion at one or both assessments. The test-retest reliability for all scales and one single item was 0.78 or higher. The stability of the two remaining single items was lower. On the basis of known-groups comparisons, selective scales distinguished clearly between patients differing in disease stage, initial and on-treatment performance status and the presence of a stoma. Additionally, selective scales detected change over time as a function of change in performance status and treatment-induced change. These results lend support to the clinical validity of the QLQ-CR38 as a supplementary questionnaire for assessing specific QL issues relevant to patients with colorectal cancer. Additional efforts to test the module's cross-cultural validity are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10448266     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00357-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  141 in total

1.  Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Shigeru Yamagishi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Jun Watanabe; Hirokazu Suwa; Takashi Oshima; Chikara Kunisaki; Shigeo Ohki; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanne A L Bartels; Malaika S Vlug; Dirk T Ubbink; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Impact of a laparoscopic resection on the quality of life in rectal cancer patients: results of 135 patients.

Authors:  Jun Li; Rong Chen; Yong-Qiang Xu; Xiao-Chen Wang; Shu Zheng; Su-Zhan Zhang; Ke-Feng Ding
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Stigma, perceived blame, self-blame, and depressive symptoms in men with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Phelan; Joan M Griffin; George L Jackson; S Yousuf Zafar; Wendy Hellerstedt; Mandy Stahre; David Nelson; Leah L Zullig; Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Quality of Life assessment through the EORTC questionnaires of colorectal cancer patients in advanced disease stages.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras Urdaniz; Ruth Vera García; Maite Martínez Aguillo; Ana Manterola Burgaleta; Fernando Arias de la Vega; Esteban Salgado Pascual
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Sexual concerns in cancer patients: a comparison of GI and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Rebecca A Shelby; Francis J Keefe; Laura S Porter; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Assessment of body image in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert N Whistance; Rebecca Gilbert; Peter Fayers; Robert J Longman; Anne Pullyblank; Michael Thomas; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Quality of life and symptoms in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol LTS-01.

Authors:  Hiroko Kunitake; Marcia M Russell; Ping Zheng; Greg Yothers; Stephanie R Land; Laura Petersen; Louis Fehrenbacher; Jeffery K Giguere; D Lawrence Wickerham; Clifford Y Ko; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 10.  Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Vithusha Ganesh; Arnav Agarwal; Marko Popovic; David Cella; Rachel McDonald; Sherlyn Vuong; Henry Lam; Leigha Rowbottom; Stephanie Chan; Tasneem Barakat; Carlo DeAngelis; Michael Borean; Edward Chow; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.