Literature DB >> 10344676

Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma.

P Hermanek1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of institutions and individual surgeons on long-term prognosis after curative resection of rectal carcinoma.
METHODS: We used univariate and multivariate analysis of data from a German prospective, multicenter, patient-care evaluation study.
RESULTS: The locoregional recurrence rates and the observed and cancer-related survival rates showed a considerable interinstitutional and intersurgeon variability. Multivariate analysis confirmed the institution and the individual surgeon as significant independent factors influencing locoregional recurrence and survival. There was a statistically highly significant correlation between the rate of locoregional recurrence and survival rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon's technique and skill has to focus on prevention of locoregional recurrence to achieve good long-term outcome after curative resection for rectal carcinoma. New clinical trials on adjuvant treatment have to include quality assurance for surgery and pathology and documentation of the surgeon (as local code).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10344676     DOI: 10.1007/BF02234128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  17 in total

Review 1.  Surgical palliation in advanced disease: recent developments.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Dunn
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  [Locally recurrent rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  Th Lehnert; M Golling; J Buchholz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinases in rectal cancer.

Authors:  O Schwandner; A Schlamp; R Broll; H P Bruch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit.

Authors:  Annika Jacob; Wolfgang Albert; Thomas Jackisch; Christiane Jakob; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann; Sören Torge Mees; Sigmar Stelzner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management.

Authors:  Werner Hohenberger; Susanne Merkel; Paul Hermanek
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Systematic review of cortical bone trajectory versus pedicle screw techniques for lumbosacral spine fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Vignesh Ramachandran; Tommy M Tran; Kevin P Shah; Matthew Fadhil; Alan Lackey; Nicholas Chang; Ai-Min Wu; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Di Betta; A D'Hoore; L Filez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The investigation of primary rectal cancer by surgeons: current pattern of practice.

Authors:  Todd P W McMullen; Alexandra M Easson; Zane Cohen; Carol J Swallow
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Preoperative radiotherapy improves survival for patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for stage T3 low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ian C Lavery; Antonio Brenner; Jeffrey Hammel; Anthony J Senagore; Robert B Noone; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation or radiotherapy in rectal cancer--a review focusing on open questions.

Authors:  Lutz Moser; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Stefan Höcht
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.