Literature DB >> 17505915

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: techniques and strategies.

Bridget Wilcken1.   

Abstract

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis has been carried out for over 25 years, and clinical and cost benefits have been documented. There is still much variation in the methods and strategies adopted. All current screening programmes use a measurement of immunoreactive trypsin as a primary screening test, and in most, a second tier test involves analysing DNA mutations. The choice of DNA mutations depends on the genetic background in the region, and considerations of cost. Using DNA analysis as part of a screening procedure has introduced unwanted carrier detection, and protocols have now been devised in an attempt to avoid this. There are at least seven distinct protocols in use, all of which have different advantages and disadvantages, and no method or strategy will suit every region. Further careful study of performance and costs of various strategies is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17505915     DOI: 10.1007/s10545-007-0584-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis        ISSN: 0141-8955            Impact factor:   4.982


  34 in total

1.  Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis in Brittany, France: assessment of 10 years' experience and impact on prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  V Scotet; M de Braekeleer; M Roussey; G Rault; P Parent; M Dagorne; H Journel; A Lemoigne; J P Codet; M Catheline; V David; A Chaventré; I Duguépéroux; C Verlingue; I Quéré; B Mercier; M P Audrézet; C Férec
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E P Parsons; A J Clarke; D M Bradley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Combining immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein assays, a method of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis that avoids DNA analysis.

Authors:  Jacques Sarles; Patrice Berthézène; Christian Le Louarn; Claude Somma; Jean-Marc Perini; Michael Catheline; Sophie Mirallié; Karine Luzet; Michael Roussey; Jean-Pierre Farriaux; Jacques Berthelot; Jean-Charles Dagorn
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Assessing the cost of cystic fibrosis diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Marjorie A Rosenberg; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Cost-effectiveness of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Hinke M Dankert; Paul H Verkerk; Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  A survey of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Europe.

Authors:  Kevin W Southern; Anne Munck; Rodney Pollitt; Georges Travert; Luisa Zanolla; Jeannette Dankert-Roelse; Carlo Castellani
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Newborn screening strategy for cystic fibrosis: a field study in an area with high allelic heterogeneity.

Authors:  C Castellani; A Bonizzato; G Cabrini; G Mastella
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.299

8.  Dried-blood spot screening for cystic fibrosis in the newborn.

Authors:  J R Crossley; R B Elliott; P A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Early pulmonary manifestation of cystic fibrosis in children with the DeltaF508/R117H-7T genotype.

Authors:  Brian P O'Sullivan; Robert G Zwerdling; Henry L Dorkin; Anne Marie Comeau; Richard Parad
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Population-based newborn screening for genetic disorders when multiple mutation DNA testing is incorporated: a cystic fibrosis newborn screening model demonstrating increased sensitivity but more carrier detections.

Authors:  Anne Marie Comeau; Richard B Parad; Henry L Dorkin; Mark Dovey; Robert Gerstle; Kenan Haver; Allen Lapey; Brian P O'Sullivan; David A Waltz; Robert G Zwerdling; Roger B Eaton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Newborn blood spot screening: new opportunities, old problems.

Authors:  R J Pollitt
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Annette M M Vernooij-van Langen; J Gerard Loeber; Bert Elvers; Ralf H Triepels; Jos Roefs; Johan J Gille; Sandra Reijntjens; Edward Dompeling; Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 3.  Very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (VLCAD-) deficiency-studies on treatment effects and long-term outcomes in mouse models.

Authors:  Sara Tucci
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Optimal DNA tier for the IRT/DNA algorithm determined by CFTR mutation results over 14 years of newborn screening.

Authors:  Mei W Baker; Molly Groose; Gary Hoffman; Michael Rock; Hara Levy; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Dried blood spots for the enzymatic diagnosis of lysosomal storage diseases in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Adrian C Sewell; Mark E Haskins; Urs Giger
Journal:  Vet Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.180

6.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis by use of a multiplex immunoassay.

Authors:  Barbara A Lindau-Shepard; Kenneth A Pass
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Frequency of Usher syndrome in two pediatric populations: Implications for genetic screening of deaf and hard of hearing children.

Authors:  William J Kimberling; Michael S Hildebrand; A Eliot Shearer; Maren L Jensen; Jennifer A Halder; Karmen Trzupek; Edward S Cohn; Richard G Weleber; Edwin M Stone; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.