Literature DB >> 16182665

Combining immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein assays, a method of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis that avoids DNA analysis.

Jacques Sarles1, Patrice Berthézène, Christian Le Louarn, Claude Somma, Jean-Marc Perini, Michael Catheline, Sophie Mirallié, Karine Luzet, Michael Roussey, Jean-Pierre Farriaux, Jacques Berthelot, Jean-Charles Dagorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a strategy in which, after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) determination, genetic analysis is replaced by a biological test, the pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). STUDY
DESIGN: The French newborn screening program includes cystic fibrosis (CF) screening by the IRT/CFTR mutation strategy. PAP was assayed on screening cards, in parallel with IRT, in all newborns from 5 French regions (n = 204,749). Analysis of PAP values in CF and non-CF newborns with elevated IRT allowed direct comparison between the current strategy and the proposed IRT/PAP strategy.
RESULTS: A protocol in which newborns with IRT >50 ng/mL and PAP >1.8 ng/mL and those with IRT >100 ng/mL and PAP >1.0 ng/mL are directly recalled for sweat testing would have the same performance as the IRT/CFTR mutation strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: The IRT/PAP strategy is an alternative for CF newborn screening, which avoids the drawbacks of genetic analysis and is cheaper and easier to implement than the current IRT/CFTR mutation strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182665     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  16 in total

1.  Newborn screening.

Authors:  James J Pitt
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2010-05

2.  Methodology matters.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: do we need a second IRT?

Authors:  J F Price
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: techniques and strategies.

Authors:  Bridget Wilcken
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.982

5.  Neonatal screening for metabolic and endocrine disorders.

Authors:  Erik Harms; Bernhard Olgemöller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Annette M M Vernooij-van Langen; J Gerard Loeber; Bert Elvers; Ralf H Triepels; Jos Roefs; Johan J Gille; Sandra Reijntjens; Edward Dompeling; Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 7.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Jack K Sharp; Michael J Rock
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis by use of a multiplex immunoassay.

Authors:  Barbara A Lindau-Shepard; Kenneth A Pass
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a lesson in public health disparities.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA.

Authors:  Veronika Krulišová; Miroslava Balaščaková; Veronika Skalická; Tereza Piskáčková; Andrea Holubová; Jana Paděrová; Petra Křenková; Lenka Dvořáková; Dana Zemková; Petr Kračmar; Blanka Chovancová; Věra Vávrová; Alexandra Stambergová; Felix Votava; Milan Macek
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.