Literature DB >> 21373217

Implementation of External Quality Assurance Trials for Immunohistochemically Determined Breast Cancer Biomarkers in Germany.

Reinhard von Wasielewski1, Claudia A Krusche, Joseph Rüschoff, Anette Fisseler-Eckhoff, Hans Kreipe.   

Abstract

Besides typing and grading of breast cancer, Pathologists are involved in the determination of biomarkers, such as steroid hormone receptors and HER2, which are of utmost importance in adjuvant therapy. There have been concerns with regard to security and reproducibility of the biomarker assays done on tissue sections applying either immunohistochemistry or in-situ hybridisation. In order to assure the quality of these biomarker assays, a number of measures are required, among them external proficiency testing. Therefore, external quality assurance trials have been implemented in Germany. In the period of 2002-2007, 5 consecutive trials were conducted with up to 180 participating laboratories. Tissue microarrays with 20-24 different breast cancer samples including cell lines enabled that a huge number of pathologists were challenged with identical samples which provides the prerequisite for comparability. Because there is no legal duress to undergo external proficiency testing in histopathology, all laboratories that took part volunteered to do so. These innovative quality assurance trials (Qualitätsinitiative Pathologie, QuIP) will be continued in the future on an annual or bi-annual basis. Participation is recommended for pathology departments involved in the service for breast units. The organisational frame work of the trials is described here.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21373217      PMCID: PMC2931088          DOI: 10.1159/000121885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  16 in total

1.  Quality assurance in immunohistochemistry: results of an interlaboratory trial involving 172 pathologists.

Authors:  Thomas Rüdiger; H Höfler; H-H Kreipe; H Nizze; U Pfeifer; H Stein; F E Dallenbach; H-P Fischer; M Mengel; R von Wasielewski; H K Müller-Hermelink
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Interlaboratory variation in results from immunohistochemical assessment of estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Lester J Layfield; Neal Goldstein; Kathryn R Perkinson; Alan D Proia
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Quantification of immunohistochemistry--issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II.

Authors:  C R Taylor; R M Levenson
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Johnny Raffoul; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Stephen Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A Gusterson; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Standardizing slide-based assays in breast cancer: hormone receptors, HER2, and sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Tissue array technology for testing interlaboratory and interobserver reproducibility of immunohistochemical estrogen receptor analysis in a large multicenter trial.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Michael Mengel; Birgitt Wiese; Thomas Rüdiger; Hans Konrad Müller-Hermelink; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Interlaboratory comparison of immunohistochemical testing for HER2: results of the 2004 and 2005 College of American Pathologists HER2 Immunohistochemistry Tissue Microarray Survey.

Authors:  Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Douglas A Murphy; David M Dorfman; Patrick C Roche; Raymond R Tubbs
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union--an inter-laboratory study.

Authors:  C A Wells; J P Sloane; D Coleman; C Munt; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Boecker; G Bussolati; C E Connolly; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; A Reiner; E Saksela; B Sigal-Zafrani; M Sylvan; B Borisch; G Cserni; T Decker; H Kerner; J Kulka; P Regitnig; A Sapino; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  6 in total

1.  Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations.

Authors:  S Bianchi; S Caini; M Paglierani; C Saieva; V Vezzosi; G Baroni; A Simoni; D Palli
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Pathologists' Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry - Is It the Solution to a Complex Problem?

Authors:  Angelika Reiner-Concin
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Guideline on the requirements of external quality assessment programs in molecular pathology.

Authors:  J Han van Krieken; Nicola Normanno; Fiona Blackhall; Elke Boone; Gerardo Botti; Fatima Carneiro; Ilhan Celik; Fortunato Ciardiello; Ian A Cree; Zandra C Deans; Anders Edsjö; Patricia J T A Groenen; Outi Kamarainen; Hans H Kreipe; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Antonio Marchetti; Samuel Murray; Frank J M Opdam; Scott D Patterson; Simon Patton; Carmine Pinto; Etienne Rouleau; Ed Schuuring; Silke Sterck; Miquel Taron; Sabine Tejpar; Wim Timens; Erik Thunnissen; Peter M van de Ven; Albert G Siebers; Elisabeth Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Quality assessment of HER2 testing by monitoring of positivity rates.

Authors:  Harald Choritz; Guntram Büsche; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation.

Authors:  David C Wilbur; Elena F Brachtel; John R Gilbertson; Nicholas C Jones; John G Vallone; Savitra Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-05-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.