Literature DB >> 17504936

Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is required for the spindle checkpoint response to lack of tension at kinetochores.

Emma M J King1, Najma Rachidi, Nick Morrice, Kevin G Hardwick, Michael J R Stark.   

Abstract

The spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset until all chromosomes are correctly attached to microtubules. Ipl1 protein kinase (Aurora B) is required to correct inappropriate kinetochore-microtubule attachments and for the response to lack of tension between sister kinetochores. Here we identify residues in the checkpoint protein Mad3p that are phosphorylated by Ipl1p. When phosphorylation of Mad3p at two sites is prevented, the cell's response to reduced kinetochore tension is dramatically curtailed. Our data provide strong evidence for a distinct checkpoint pathway responding to lack of sister kinetochore tension, in which Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is a key step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504936      PMCID: PMC1865488          DOI: 10.1101/gad.431507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  31 in total

1.  Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  B M Stern; A W Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension.

Authors:  Katie B Shannon; Julie C Canman; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling.

Authors:  Andrea Musacchio; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints.

Authors:  Daniel J Lew; Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p.

Authors:  Iain M Cheeseman; Scott Anderson; Miri Jwa; Erin M Green; Jung seog Kang; John R Yates; Clarence S M Chan; David G Drubin; Georjana Barnes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  S Biggins; A W Murray
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Najma Rachidi; Carsten Janke; Gislene Pereira; Marta Galova; Elmar Schiebel; Michael J R Stark; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells.

Authors:  S S Taylor; D Hussein; Y Wang; S Elderkin; C J Morrow
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p.

Authors:  K G Hardwick; R C Johnston; D L Smith; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-03-06       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Functional cooperation of Dam1, Ipl1, and the inner centromere protein (INCENP)-related protein Sli15 during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  J Kang; I M Cheeseman; G Kallstrom; S Velmurugan; G Barnes; C S Chan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance or the cuckoo clock.

Authors:  Jonathon Pines; Iain Hagan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  The chromosomal passenger complex controls spindle checkpoint function independent from its role in correcting microtubule kinetochore interactions.

Authors:  Gerben Vader; Carin W A Cruijsen; Tanja van Harn; Martijn J M Vromans; René H Medema; Susanne M A Lens
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Systematic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that the spindle checkpoint is composed of two largely independent branches.

Authors:  Anthony Essex; Alexander Dammermann; Lindsay Lewellyn; Karen Oegema; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint.

Authors:  Tariq H Warsi; Michelle S Navarro; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 7.  Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Vincent Vanoosthuyse; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 10.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.