Literature DB >> 17496016

Ab initio protein structure prediction using chunk-TASSER.

Hongyi Zhou1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

We have developed an ab initio protein structure prediction method called chunk-TASSER that uses ab initio folded supersecondary structure chunks of a given target as well as threading templates for obtaining contact potentials and distance restraints. The predicted chunks, selected on the basis of a new fragment comparison method, are folded by a fragment insertion method. Full-length models are built and refined by the TASSER methodology, which searches conformational space via parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo. We employ an optimized reduced force field that includes knowledge-based statistical potentials and restraints derived from the chunks as well as threading templates. The method is tested on a dataset of 425 hard target proteins < or =250 amino acids in length. The average TM-scores of the best of top five models per target are 0.266, 0.336, and 0.362 by the threading algorithm SP(3), original TASSER and chunk-TASSER, respectively. For a subset of 80 proteins with predicted alpha-helix content > or =50%, these averages are 0.284, 0.356, and 0.403, respectively. The percentages of proteins with the best of top five models having TM-score > or =0.4 (a statistically significant threshold for structural similarity) are 3.76, 20.94, and 28.94% by SP(3), TASSER, and chunk-TASSER, respectively, overall, while for the subset of 80 predominantly helical proteins, these percentages are 2.50, 23.75, and 41.25%. Thus, chunk-TASSER shows a significant improvement over TASSER for modeling hard targets where no good template can be identified. We also tested chunk-TASSER on 21 medium/hard targets <200 amino-acids-long from CASP7. Chunk-TASSER is approximately 11% (10%) better than TASSER for the total TM-score of the first (best of top five) models. Chunk-TASSER is fully automated and can be used in proteome scale protein structure prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496016      PMCID: PMC1948038          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.109959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  48 in total

1.  Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models.

Authors:  D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis.

Authors:  J Skolnick; J S Fetrow; A Kolinski
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy.

Authors:  F S Domingues; P Lackner; A Andreeva; M J Sippl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information.

Authors:  L Rychlewski; L Jaroszewski; W Li; A Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A global optimization strategy for predicting alpha-helical protein tertiary structure.

Authors:  S Crivelli; R Byrd; E Eskow; R Schnabe; R Yu; T M Philip; T Head-Gordon
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  2000-05

7.  Progress in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  A G Murzin
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-02

8.  Constraint-based assembly of tertiary protein structures from secondary structure elements.

Authors:  K Yue; K A Dill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments.

Authors:  L Jaroszewski; L Rychlewski; A Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Y Xia; E S Huang; M Levitt; R Samudrala
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  39 in total

1.  Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

2.  TASSER_WT: a protein structure prediction algorithm with accurate predicted contact restraints for difficult protein targets.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using I-TASSER.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-12-17

4.  FINDSITE-metal: integrating evolutionary information and machine learning for structure-based metal-binding site prediction at the proteome level.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-12-06

5.  A comparative study of the reported performance of ab initio protein structure prediction algorithms.

Authors:  Glennie Helles
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Protein structure prediction by pro-Sp3-TASSER.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Accelerating physical simulations of proteins by leveraging external knowledge.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Joseph A Morrone; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19

9.  Toward optimal fragment generations for ab initio protein structure assembly.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-10-16

10.  (PS)2-v2: template-based protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  Chih-Chieh Chen; Jenn-Kang Hwang; Jinn-Moon Yang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.