Literature DB >> 22972754

Toward optimal fragment generations for ab initio protein structure assembly.

Dong Xu1, Yang Zhang.   

Abstract

Fragment assembly using structural motifs excised from other solved proteins has shown to be an efficient method for ab initio protein-structure prediction. However, how to construct accurate fragments, how to derive optimal restraints from fragments, and what the best fragment length is are the basic issues yet to be systematically examined. In this work, we developed a gapless-threading method to generate position-specific structure fragments. Distance profiles and torsion angle pairs are then derived from the fragments by statistical consistency analysis, which achieved comparable accuracy with the machine-learning-based methods although the fragments were taken from unrelated proteins. When measured by both accuracies of the derived distance profiles and torsion angle pairs, we come to a consistent conclusion that the optimal fragment length for structural assembly is around 10, and at least 100 fragments at each location are needed to achieve optimal structure assembly. The distant profiles and torsion angle pairs as derived by the fragments have been successfully used in QUARK for ab initio protein structure assembly and are provided by the QUARK online server at http://zhanglab.ccmb. med.umich.edu/QUARK/.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972754      PMCID: PMC3551984          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  45 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  B Rost
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1999-02

4.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  HHfrag: HMM-based fragment detection using HHpred.

Authors:  Ivan Kalev; Michael Habeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8.

Authors:  Iakes Ezkurdia; Osvaldo Graña; José M G Izarzugaza; Michael L Tress
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

8.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  77 in total

1.  Integration of QUARK and I-TASSER for Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction in CASP11.

Authors:  Wenxuan Zhang; Jianyi Yang; Baoji He; Sara Elizabeth Walker; Hongjiu Zhang; Brandon Govindarajoo; Jouko Virtanen; Zhidong Xue; Hong-Bin Shen; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Accurate disulfide-bonding network predictions improve ab initio structure prediction of cysteine-rich proteins.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Bao-Ji He; Richard Jang; Yang Zhang; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Protein depth calculation and the use for improving accuracy of protein fold recognition.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Hua Li; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  FFAS-3D: improving fold recognition by including optimized structural features and template re-ranking.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Zhanwen Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Specific binding between Bacillus thuringiensis Cry9Aa and Vip3Aa toxins synergizes their toxicity against Asiatic rice borer (Chilo suppressalis).

Authors:  Zeyu Wang; Longfa Fang; Zishan Zhou; Sabino Pacheco; Isabel Gómez; Fuping Song; Mario Soberón; Jie Zhang; Alejandra Bravo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Template-based and free modeling of I-TASSER and QUARK pipelines using predicted contact maps in CASP12.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; S M Mortuza; Baoji He; Yanting Wang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-14

7.  Deep-learning contact-map guided protein structure prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Yang Li; Chengxin Zhang; Robin Pearce; S M Mortuza; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-14

8.  Annotation of Alternatively Spliced Proteins and Transcripts with Protein-Folding Algorithms and Isoform-Level Functional Networks.

Authors:  Hongdong Li; Yang Zhang; Yuanfang Guan; Rajasree Menon; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

9.  Using NMR Chemical Shifts and Cryo-EM Density Restraints in Iterative Rosetta-MD Protein Structure Refinement.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  NMR-assisted protein structure prediction with MELDxMD.

Authors:  James C Robertson; Roy Nassar; Cong Liu; Emiliano Brini; Ken A Dill; Alberto Perez
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.