Literature DB >> 17494954

Novel pressure-to-cornea index in glaucoma.

Milko E Iliev1, Alexander Meyenberg, Ernst Buerki, George Shafranov, M Bruce Shields.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several conversion tables and formulas have been suggested to correct applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) for central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT is also thought to represent an independent glaucoma risk factor. In an attempt to integrate IOP and CCT into a unified risk factor and avoid uncertain correction for tonometric inaccuracy, a new pressure-to-cornea index (PCI) is proposed.
METHODS: PCI (IOP/CCT(3)) was defined as the ratio between untreated IOP and CCT(3) in mm (ultrasound pachymetry). PCI distribution in 220 normal controls, 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 76 with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 89 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was investigated. PCI's ability to discriminate between glaucoma (NTG+POAG) and non-glaucoma (controls+OHT) was compared with that of three published formulae for correcting IOP for CCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built.
RESULTS: Mean PCI values were: Controls 92.0 (SD 24.8), NTG 129.1 (SD 25.8), OHT 134.0 (SD 26.5), POAG 173.6 (SD 40.9). To minimise IOP bias, eyes within the same 2 mm Hg range between 16 and 29 mm Hg (16-17, 18-19, etc) were separately compared: control and NTG eyes as well as OHT and POAG eyes differed significantly. PCI demonstrated a larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) and significantly higher sensitivity at fixed 80% and 90% specificities compared with each of the correction formulas; optimum PCI cut-off value 133.8.
CONCLUSIONS: A PCI range of 120-140 is proposed as the upper limit of "normality", 120 being the cut-off value for eyes with untreated pressures <or=21 mm Hg, 140 when untreated pressure >or=22 mm Hg. PCI may reflect individual susceptibility to a given IOP level, and thus represent a glaucoma risk factor. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove its prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494954      PMCID: PMC2001018          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.120980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  25 in total

1.  Tono-Pen tonometer and corneal thickness.

Authors:  K H Mok; C S Wong; V W Lee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.

Authors:  Y-C Ko; C J-L Liu; W-M Hsu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; T Newson; A El Sheikh; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.

Authors:  G J Orssengo; D C Pye
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  R C Wolfs; C C Klaver; J R Vingerling; D E Grobbee; A Hofman; P T de Jong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Applying the recent clinical trials on primary open angle glaucoma: the developing world perspective.

Authors:  Ravi Thomas; Rajesh S Kumar; G Chandrasekhar; Rajul Parikh
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Aoife Doyle; Yves Lachkar
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].

Authors:  M Kohlhaas; E Spörl; A G Böhm; K Pollack; D Sandner; L E Pillunat
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.700

10.  Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic.

Authors:  Elsa Aghaian; Joyce E Choe; Shan Lin; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the Cameroonian nonglaucomatous population.

Authors:  André Omgbwa Eballe; Godefroy Koki; Augustin Ellong; Didier Owono; Emilienne Epée; Lucienne Assumpta Bella; Côme Ebana Mvogo; Jeanne Mayouego Kouam
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-30

2.  Correlation between the pressure-to-cornea index and both structural and functional measures of glaucoma.

Authors:  Andrea Mbv Franco; Niro Kasahara
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 3.  Surgical Decisions in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma with Low or Normal Tension.

Authors:  J W Shum; Dy Leung
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2013-09-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.