Literature DB >> 16240277

[Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].

M Kohlhaas1, E Spörl, A G Böhm, K Pollack, D Sandner, L E Pillunat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Until now it was thought that morphological parameters of the eye such as corneal thickness, corneal curvature and axial length do not affect tonometry results. However, the aim of this study was to find out whether there actually is an influence of these parameters on applanation tonometry. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: In this prospective study we examined 125 eyes of 125 normal patients with a corneal thickness of 568.8 +/- 43.79 microm, a corneal curvature of 7.72 +/- 0.27 mm and an axial length of 23.62 +/- 2.05 mm. Before performing a phacoemulsification, the anterior chamber was temporarily punctured. With a closed system the intraocular pressure (IOP) was manometrically set at 20, 35 and 50 mmHg using an H (2)O column. The IOP was then measured with a Perkins tonometer. With these patients we compared 102 eyes that had undergone LASIK due to a myopia of 6.3 +/- 2.17 D. Before and 6 months after surgery, IOD, k-values and central corneal thickness of these patients were measured.
RESULTS: At all set pressure levels there was a highly significant correlation of measured IOP and corneal thickness. At all set pressure levels the measured IOP significantly depended on corneal thickness (r(2) = 0.78 - 0.83). After LASIK, IOP was reduced from 16.5 +/- 2.1 to 12.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg. There was a significant correlation between IOP and corneal curvature as well as corneal thickness (r(2) = 0.631; P < 0.001). The biomechanical characteristics of the cornea are changed so that the measured IOP has to be corrected by an additional 0.75 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: Since corneal thickness does affect Goldmann applanation tonometry we recommend to use the "Dresden Correction Table" (Tab. ) to achieve the real IOP. Pressure measurements after LASIK are inaccurate because of a change in corneal biomechanics, corneal thickness and curvature and they should be corrected as follows: IOP (real) = IOP (measured) + (540 - CCT)/71 + (43 - K-value)/2.7 + 0.75 mmHg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240277     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Glaucoma diagnostics and corneal thickness].

Authors:  J von Eicken; M Kohlhaas; H Höh
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [The risk of glaucoma and corneal thickness].

Authors:  A G Böhm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Presentation of software for collation of inpatient diurnal pressure profiles in glaucoma patients].

Authors:  S Christmann; C Leisser; N Schrage
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  F Rüfer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Novel pressure-to-cornea index in glaucoma.

Authors:  Milko E Iliev; Alexander Meyenberg; Ernst Buerki; George Shafranov; M Bruce Shields
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of Intraocular Pressure before and after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Refractive Surgery Measured with Perkins Tonometry, Noncontact Tonometry, and Transpalpebral Tonometry.

Authors:  Isabel Cacho; Juan Sanchez-Naves; Laura Batres; Jesús Pintor; Gonzalo Carracedo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.