Literature DB >> 17488010

Methyl rotation barriers in proteins from 2H relaxation data. Implications for protein structure.

Yi Xue1, Maria S Pavlova, Yaroslav E Ryabov, Bernd Reif, Nikolai R Skrynnikov.   

Abstract

Side-chain 2H and backbone 15N relaxation data have been collected at multiple temperatures in the samples of the SH3 domain from alpha-spectrin. Combined analyses of the data allowed for determination of the temperature-dependent correlation times tauf characterizing fast methyl motion. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that tauf are dominated by methyl rotation; the corresponding activation energies approximate methyl rotation barriers. For 33 methyl groups in the alpha-spectrin SH3 domain the average barrier height was thus determined to be 2.8 +/- 0.9 kcal/mol. This value is deemed representative of the "fluid" hydrophobic protein core where some barriers are increased and others are lowered because of the contacts with surrounding atoms, but there is no local order that could produce systematically higher (lower) barriers. For comparison, the MD simulation predicts the average barrier of 3.1 kcal/mol (calculated via the potential of mean force) or 3.4-3.5 kcal/mol (rigid barriers after appropriate averaging over multiple MD snapshots). The latter result prompted us to investigate rigid methyl rotation barriers in a series of NMR structures from the Protein Databank. In most cases the barriers proved to be higher than expected, 4-6 kcal/mol. To a certain degree, this is caused by tight packing of the side chains in the NMR structures and stems from the structure calculation procedure where the coordinates are first annealed toward the temperature of 0 K and then subjected to energy minimization. In several cases the barriers >10 kcal/mol are indicative of van der Waals violations. The notable exceptions are (i) the structures solved using the GROMOS force field where tight methyl packing is avoided (3.0-3.6 kcal/mol) and (ii) the structure solved by means of the dynamic ensemble refinement method (Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Best, R. B.; DePristo, M. A.; Dobson, C. M.; Vendruscolo, M. Nature 2005, 433, 128) (3.5 kcal/mol). These results demonstrate that methyl rotation barriers, derived from the experiments that are traditionally associated with studies of protein dynamics, can be also used in the context of structural work. This is particularly interesting in view of the recent efforts to incorporate dynamics data in the process of protein structure elucidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17488010     DOI: 10.1021/ja0702061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  24 in total

Review 1.  Structural dynamics of bio-macromolecules by NMR: the slowly relaxing local structure approach.

Authors:  Eva Meirovitch; Yury E Shapiro; Antonino Polimeno; Jack H Freed
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.795

2.  Effect of subdomain interactions on methyl group dynamics in the hydrophobic core of villin headpiece protein.

Authors:  Liliya Vugmeyster; Tien Do; Dmitry Ostrovsky; Riqianq Fu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Paramagnetic relaxation enhancements in unfolded proteins: theory and application to drkN SH3 domain.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Ivan S Podkorytov; D Krishna Rao; Nathan Benjamin; Honglei Sun; Nikolai R Skrynnikov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Comparative Dynamics of Methionine Side-Chain in FMOC-Methionine and in Amyloid Fibrils.

Authors:  Liliya Vugmeyster; Dmitry Ostrovsky
Journal:  Chem Phys Lett       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.328

5.  Entropy in molecular recognition by proteins.

Authors:  José A Caro; Kyle W Harpole; Vignesh Kasinath; Jackwee Lim; Jeffrey Granja; Kathleen G Valentine; Kim A Sharp; A Joshua Wand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fast Motions of Key Methyl Groups in Amyloid-β Fibrils.

Authors:  Liliya Vugmeyster; Dmitry Ostrovsky; Matthew A Clark; Isaac B Falconer; Gina L Hoatson; Wei Qiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Coupled flexibility change in cytochrome P450cam substrate binding determined by neutron scattering, NMR, and molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; Zheng Yi; Carey Cantrell; Dennis C Glass; Jerome Baudry; Nitin Jain; Jeremy C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Site-specific analysis of heteronuclear Overhauser effects in microcrystalline proteins.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Lopez del Amo; Vipin Agarwal; Riddhiman Sarkar; Justin Porter; Sam Asami; Martin Rübbelke; Uwe Fink; Yi Xue; Oliver F Lange; Bernd Reif
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Peptide and Protein Dynamics and Low-Temperature/DNP Magic Angle Spinning NMR.

Authors:  Qing Zhe Ni; Evgeny Markhasin; Thach V Can; Björn Corzilius; Kong Ooi Tan; Alexander B Barnes; Eugenio Daviso; Yongchao Su; Judith Herzfeld; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  Retinal dynamics during light activation of rhodopsin revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michael F Brown; Gilmar F J Salgado; Andrey V Struts
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.