Literature DB >> 17485977

Combined effects of frequency compression-expansion and shift on speech recognition.

Deniz Başkent1, Robert V Shannon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore combined acute effects of frequency shift and compression-expansion on speech recognition, using noiseband vocoder processing.
DESIGN: Recognition of vowels and consonants, processed with a noiseband vocoder, was measured with five normal-hearing subjects, between the ages of 27 and 35 yr. The speech signal was filtered into 8 or 16 analysis bands and the envelopes were extracted from each band. The carrier noise bands were modulated by the envelopes and resynthesized to produce the processed speech. In the baseline matched condition, the frequency ranges of the corresponding analysis and carrier bands were the same. In the shift only condition, the frequency ranges of the carrier bands were shifted up or down relative to the analysis bands. In the compression and expansion only conditions, the analysis band range was made larger or smaller, respectively, than the carrier band range. By applying the shift to carrier bands and compression or expansion to analysis bands simultaneously, the combined effects of the two spectral distortions on speech recognition were explored.
RESULTS: When the spectral distortions of compression-expansion or shift were applied separately, the performance was reduced from the baseline matched condition. However, when the two spectral degradations were applied simultaneously, a compensatory effect was observed; the reduction in performance was smaller for some combinations compared to the reduction observed for each distortion individually.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study are consistent with previous vocoder studies with normal-hearing subjects that showed a negative effect of spectral mismatch between analysis and carrier bands on speech recognition. The present results further show that matching the frequency ranges of 1 to 2 kHz, which contain important speech information, can be more beneficial for speech recognition than matching the overall frequency ranges, in certain conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485977     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318050d398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  14 in total

1.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Toddlers' recognition of noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle Newman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Emily Shroads; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of tonotopic matching and spatial cues on segregation of competing speech in simulations of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mathew Thomas; Shelby Willis; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of upper-frequency boundary and spectral warping on speech intelligibility in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.