Literature DB >> 17482521

Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: A methodological review.

Philip R O Payne1, Eneida A Mendonça, Stephen B Johnson, Justin B Starren.   

Abstract

The use of conceptual knowledge collections or structures within the biomedical domain is pervasive, spanning a variety of applications including controlled terminologies, semantic networks, ontologies, and database schemas. A number of theoretical constructs and practical methods or techniques support the development and evaluation of conceptual knowledge collections. This review will provide an overview of the current state of knowledge concerning conceptual knowledge acquisition, drawing from multiple contributing academic disciplines such as biomedicine, computer science, cognitive science, education, linguistics, semiotics, and psychology. In addition, multiple taxonomic approaches to the description and selection of conceptual knowledge acquisition and evaluation techniques will be proposed in order to partially address the apparent fragmentation of the current literature concerning this domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17482521      PMCID: PMC2082059          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  41 in total

1.  Natural language processing and its future in medicine.

Authors:  C Friedman; G Hripcsak
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Collaborative efforts for representing nursing concepts in computer-based systems: international perspectives.

Authors:  A Coenen; H F Marin; H A Park; S Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  A primer on aspects of cognition for medical informatics.

Authors:  V L Patel; J F Arocha; D R Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Reference standards, judges, and comparison subjects: roles for experts in evaluating system performance.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Adam Wilcox
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Methods of cognitive analysis to support the design and evaluation of biomedical systems: the case of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  V L Patel; J F Arocha; M Diermeier; R A Greenes; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 6.  Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Computer-based drug ordering: evaluation of interaction with a decision-support system.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; David R Kaufman; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

8.  Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Adam S Rothschild
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Representing thoughts, words, and things in the UMLS.

Authors:  K E Campbell; D E Oliver; K A Spackman; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; C Friedman; P O Alderson; W DuMouchel; S B Johnson; P D Clayton
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  20 in total

1.  Automatic knowledge-based recognition of low-level tasks in ophthalmological procedures.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; David Bouget; Laurent Riffaud; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The TOKEn project: knowledge synthesis for in silico science.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Tara B Borlawsky; Omkar Lele; Stephen James; Andrew W Greaves
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Applying knowledge-anchored hypothesis discovery methods to advance clinical and translational research: the OAMiner project.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Rebecca D Jackson; Thomas M Best; Tara B Borlawsky; Albert M Lai; Stephen James; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Natural Language Processing methods and systems for biomedical ontology learning.

Authors:  Kaihong Liu; William R Hogan; Rebecca S Crowley
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  A knowledge-anchored integrative image search and retrieval system.

Authors:  Selnur Erdal; Umit V Catalyurek; Philip R O Payne; Joel Saltz; Jyoti Kamal; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Pierre Jannin; Gero Strauss; Juergen Meixensberger; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Supporting the design of translational clinical studies through the generation and verification of conceptual knowledge-anchored hypotheses.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Philip Richard Orrin Payne; Tara B Borlawsky; Tara Borlawsky; Alan Kwok; Andrew W Greaves; Andrew Greaves
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

Review 8.  Translational informatics: enabling high-throughput research paradigms.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Peter J Embi; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 3.107

9.  Perceptions of physicians about knowledge sharing barriers in Turkish health care system.

Authors:  Ömer Gider; Saffet Ocak; Mehmet Top
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Multi-dimensional discovery of biomarker and phenotype complexes.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Kun Huang; Kristin Keen-Circle; Abhisek Kundu; Jie Zhang; Tara B Borlawsky
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.