Literature DB >> 21984589

The TOKEn project: knowledge synthesis for in silico science.

Philip R O Payne1, Tara B Borlawsky, Omkar Lele, Stephen James, Andrew W Greaves.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The conduct of investigational studies that involve large-scale data sets presents significant challenges related to the discovery and testing of novel hypotheses capable of supporting in silico discovery science. The use of what are known as Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases (CKDD) methods provides a potential means of scaling hypothesis discovery and testing approaches for large data sets. Such methods enable the high-throughput generation and evaluation of knowledge-anchored relationships between complexes of variables found in targeted data sets.
METHODS: The authors have conducted a multipart model formulation and validation process, focusing on the development of a methodological and technical approach to using CKDD to support hypothesis discovery for in silico science. The model the authors have developed is known as the Translational Ontology-anchored Knowledge Discovery Engine (TOKEn). This model utilizes a specific CKDD approach known as Constructive Induction to identify and prioritize potential hypotheses related to the meaningful semantic relationships between variables found in large-scale and heterogeneous biomedical data sets.
RESULTS: The authors have verified and validated TOKEn in the context of a translational research data repository maintained by the NCI-funded Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research Consortium. Such studies have shown that TOKEn is: (1) computationally tractable; and (2) able to generate valid and potentially useful hypotheses concerning relationships between phenotypic and biomolecular variables in that data collection.
CONCLUSIONS: The TOKEn model represents a potentially useful and systematic approach to knowledge synthesis for in silico discovery science in the context of large-scale and multidimensional research data sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21984589      PMCID: PMC3241179          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  17 in total

1.  Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision.

Authors:  Elias A Zerhouni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  US biomedical research: basic, translational, and clinical sciences.

Authors:  Elias A Zerhouni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Breaking the translational barriers: the value of integrating biomedical informatics and translational research.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Stephen B Johnson; Justin B Starren; Hugh H Tilson; David Dowdy
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Reengineering clinical research with informatics.

Authors:  Thomas K Chung; Rita Kukafka; Stephen B Johnson
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Accessing and integrating data and knowledge for biomedical research.

Authors:  A Burgun; O Bodenreider
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2008

6.  Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support.

Authors:  O Bodenreider
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2008

7.  Using Frequent Co-expression Network to Identify Gene Clusters for Breast Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Kun Huang; Yang Xiang; Ruoming Jin
Journal:  Proc Int Joint Conf Bioinforma Syst Biol Intell Comput       Date:  2009-08-03

8.  Multi-dimensional discovery of biomarker and phenotype complexes.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Kun Huang; Kristin Keen-Circle; Abhisek Kundu; Jie Zhang; Tara B Borlawsky
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Evaluating the impact of conceptual knowledge engineering on the design and usability of a clinical and translational science collaboration portal.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Tara B Borlawsky; Robert Rice; Peter J Embi
Journal:  Summit Transl Bioinform       Date:  2010-03-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Effectively processing medical term queries on the UMLS Metathesaurus by layered dynamic programming.

Authors:  Kaiyu Ren; Albert M Lai; Aveek Mukhopadhyay; Raghu Machiraju; Kun Huang; Yang Xiang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases for Drug Combinations Predictions in Malignant Melanoma.

Authors:  Kelly Regan; Satyajeet Raje; Cartik Saravanamuthu; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.