Literature DB >> 11268955

The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age.

K Tsugawa1, N Koyanagi, M Hashizume, M Tomikawa, K Akahoshi, K Ayukawa, H Wada, K Tanoue, K Sugimachi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroduodenal ulcer is a very common illness in Japan. As the number of elderly persons in Japan increases the same as in Europe and America, the number of such patients requiring a gastroduodenal emergency operation has also increased. Regarding the complications of peptic ulcer, a perforation remains the most important fatal complication. The aim of this study is to investigate the operative risk factors and the long-term recurrence rates and to define the optimal surgical procedures in emergency situations in elderly patients.
METHODOLOGY: From April 1988 through March 1997, 130 patients over 70 years of age with a perforated gastroduodenal ulcer (a duodenal ulcer perforation in 50 patients and a gastric ulcer perforation in 80 patients) were operated on in an emergency situation in our clinic. We investigated the following items; medical illness, preoperative risk factor, optimal surgical procedure, postoperative organ failure and the cumulative recurrence-free rates after surgical treatment.
RESULTS: A significant correlation with mortality was observed in patients with established comorbidity in the following organs: lung (P = 0.03), heart (P = 0.02), kidney (P = 0.04), and diabetes (P = 0.03). The highest postoperative mortality rate was recorded in patients who underwent a simple closure of a duodenal ulcer perforation (4 patients; 26.7%), while the lowest postoperative mortality rate was recorded in patients who underwent a simple closure and vagotomy of a duodenal ulcer perforation (3 patients; 12.5%). In gastric ulcers, the mortality rate in patients with a gastrectomy was significantly higher than in patients with a simple closure. The practical application of the three risk factors (preoperative shock, delay to surgery over 24 hours, and medical illness) was shown by the progressive rise in the mortality rate with the increasing number of risk factors. Based on the 5 postoperative years after treating a perforated duodenal ulcer, the cumulative recurrence rate after a simple closure (63.6%) was significantly higher than that after a simple closure and vagotomy (38.1%) (n = 0.02) or after gastrectomy (0%) (P < 0.001). At 5 years postoperatively, the cumulative recurrence rate after a simple closure (41.2%) was significantly higher than that after a gastrectomy (15.9%) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in an emergency situation, elderly patients are in a highly unfavorable prognostic condition due to their advanced age, and comorbidity, which thus leads to poorer results, not only worldwide, but also in Japan. Based on our findings, in duodenal ulcer cases, a simple closure and vagotomy is recommended because of its low mortality and minimal stress, except for cases with a giant perforation measuring over 20 mm in diameter at the perforation hole or with severe duodenal stenosis. In stomach ulcer cases, a gastrectomy may be recommended because of its low recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11268955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  13 in total

1.  Duration of survival after peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors:  Michael Imhof; Stefan Epstein; Christian Ohmann; Hans-Dietrich Röher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Perforated peptic ulcer treated by simple closure and Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Roberto Fernández-Santiago; Rosa A García; Soledad Trugeda; Isabel Seco; Fernando la de Torre; Angel Naranjo; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Marco Bassi; Nazareno Smerieri; Michele Masetti; Francesco Ferrara; Carlo Fabbri; Luca Ansaloni; Stefania Ghersi; Matteo Serenari; Federico Coccolini; Noel Naidoo; Massimo Sartelli; Gregorio Tugnoli; Fausto Catena; Vincenzo Cennamo; Elio Jovine
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Gastric body partition for giant perforated peptic ulcer in critically ill elderly patients.

Authors:  Jia-Fwu Shyu; Tien-Hua Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Cheng-Hsi Su; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Impact of preoperative physiological risk profile on postoperative morbidity and mortality after emergency operation of complicated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Birte Summa; Ulrike Schulz; Clemens Schafmayer; Sebastian Hinz; Juergen Tepel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A life-saving but inadequately discussed procedure: tube duodenostomy. Known and unknown aspects.

Authors:  Burak Isik; Sezai Yilmaz; Vedat Kirimlioglu; Gokhan Sogutlu; Mehmet Yilmaz; Daniel Katz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Pierluigi Viale; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Ernest Moore; Mark Malangoni; Frederick A Moore; George Velmahos; Raul Coimbra; Rao Ivatury; Andrew Peitzman; Kaoru Koike; Ari Leppaniemi; Walter Biffl; Clay Cothren Burlew; Zsolt J Balogh; Ken Boffard; Cino Bendinelli; Sanjay Gupta; Yoram Kluger; Ferdinando Agresta; Salomone Di Saverio; Imtiaz Wani; Alex Escalona; Carlos Ordonez; Gustavo P Fraga; Gerson Alves Pereira Junior; Miklosh Bala; Yunfeng Cui; Sanjay Marwah; Boris Sakakushev; Victor Kong; Noel Naidoo; Adamu Ahmed; Ashraf Abbas; Gianluca Guercioni; Nereo Vettoretto; Rafael Díaz-Nieto; Ihor Gerych; Cristian Tranà; Mario Paulo Faro; Kuo-Ching Yuan; Kenneth Yuh Yen Kok; Alain Chichom Mefire; Jae Gil Lee; Suk-Kyung Hong; Wagih Ghnnam; Boonying Siribumrungwong; Norio Sato; Kiyoshi Murata; Takayuki Irahara; Federico Coccolini; Helmut A Segovia Lohse; Alfredo Verni; Tomohisa Shoko
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  WSES consensus conference: Guidelines for first-line management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Pierluigi Viale; Kaoru Koike; Federico Pea; Fabio Tumietto; Harry van Goor; Gianluca Guercioni; Angelo Nespoli; Cristian Tranà; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Ari Leppaniemi; Walter Biffl; Frederick A Moore; Renato Poggetti; Antonio Daniele Pinna; Ernest E Moore
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.