Literature DB >> 12549682

Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcers.

Jyrki T Mäkelä1, Heikki Kiviniemi, Pasi Ohtonen, Seppo O Laitinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The demographic changes of perforated peptic ulcer disease were assessed in a well-defined population in northern Finland. The high mortality from perforated peptic ulcer underlines the importance of risk stratification, and clinical variables and three scoring systems were therefore tested for their ability to predict the probability of morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: Two hundred and eighty patients admitted to a university hospital with peptic ulcer perforation during the 22-year period 1979-2000 were identified using a computer database, and their clinical data were reviewed from the database and patient records.
RESULTS: The annual operation rate for ulcer perforation has varied from 2.7/100,000 in 1979 to 6.2 in 1985 and 3.6 in 2000 without any significant changes during the examination period. More operations have been performed for duodenal (157) than for gastric (123) ulcer perforations, but their incidence rates were quite similar at the beginning and the end of the period. Of the clinical variables, two or more associated illnesses, duration of symptoms for more than 24 hours, the amount of abdominal liquid, and low albumin concentration predicted morbidity, while a long duration of symptoms and the amount of abdominal liquid were independent risk factors for mortality. The MPI score correctly predicted 96% of postoperative complications and all the three scores, i.e. the Boey score, the MPI score and the ASA score, were good predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of peptic ulcer perforation has not changed during the 22-year period in northern Finland. All the three scores, i.e. the Boey score, the MPI score and the ASA score, predict mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation and are suitable for risk stratification preoperatively in the surgical ward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12549682     DOI: 10.1080/110241502321116424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  22 in total

1.  Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Darin Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  İlhan Taş; Burak Veli Ülger; Akın Önder; Murat Kapan; Zübeyir Bozdağ
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-10-20

3.  A meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of postoperative mortality using the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system.

Authors:  Chieh Yang Koo; Joseph A Hyder; Jonathan P Wanderer; Matthias Eikermann; Satya Krishna Ramachandran
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer depends upon pre-operative risk: a retrospective 10-year study.

Authors:  J O Larkin; M G Bourke; A Muhammed; R Waldron; K Barry; P W Eustace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  [Nononcologic abdominal surgery in the elderly].

Authors:  H-J Gassel; D Meyer; M Sailer; A Thiede
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Impact of preoperative physiological risk profile on postoperative morbidity and mortality after emergency operation of complicated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Birte Summa; Ulrike Schulz; Clemens Schafmayer; Sebastian Hinz; Juergen Tepel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania: A tertiary hospital experience.

Authors:  Joseph B Mabula; Mheta Koy; Mabula D Mchembe; Hyasinta M Jaka; Rodrick Kabangila; Alphonce B Chandika; Japhet M Gilyoma; Phillipo L Chalya
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer complications after the introduction of the proton pump inhibitors, a study of the Swedish population from 1974-2002.

Authors:  Michael Hermansson; Anders Ekedahl; Jonas Ranstam; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.