Literature DB >> 17477746

Assessment of patients' level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile.

Siti Noor Fazliah Mohd Noor1, Sabri Musa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Determination of the psychosocial status and assessment of the level of satisfaction in Malaysian cleft palate patients and their parents.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Sixty cleft lip and palate patients (12 to 17 years of age) from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and their parents were selected. The questionnaires used were the Child Interview Schedule, the Parents Interview Schedule, and the Cleft Evaluation Profile (CEP), administered via individual interviews.
RESULTS: Patients were teased because of their clefts and felt their self-confidence was affected by the cleft condition. They were frequently teased about cleft-related features such as speech, teeth, and lip appearance. Parents also reported that their children were being teased because of their clefts and that their children's self-confidence was affected by the clefts. Both showed a significant level of satisfaction with the treatment provided by the cleft team. There was no significant difference between the responses of the patients and their parents. The features that were found to be most important for the patients and their parents, in decreasing order of priority, were teeth, nose, lips, and speech.
CONCLUSIONS: Cleft lip and/or palate patients were teased because of their clefts, and it affected their self-confidence. The Cleft Evaluation Profile is a reliable and useful tool to assess patients' level of satisfaction with treatment received for cleft lip and/or palate and can identify the types of cleft-related features that are most important for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17477746     DOI: 10.1597/05-151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  16 in total

1.  No deficit in neurocortical information processing in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Volker Gassling; Kai Receveur; Uwe Niederberger; Bernd Koos; Claudia Helene Overath; Falk Birkenfeld; Jörg Wiltfang; Wolf-Dieter Gerber; Michael Siniatchkin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM): 25 Years Of Excellent Service.

Authors:  Zaidun Kamari
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2009-01

3.  Permanent maxillary central incisor and first molar rotations in the mixed dentition in repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and their relationship with absence of teeth in their vicinity.

Authors:  Sunjay Suri; Suteeta Disthaporn; Bruce Ross; Bryan Tompson; Diogenes Baena; David Fisher; Wendy Lou
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Carolin Unger; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Keskanya Subbalekha
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22

5.  Panel perception of facial appearance of cleft patients generated by use of a morphing technique.

Authors:  Vedat Yildirim; Alexander Hemprich; Martin Gründl; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-19

6.  Shared Surgical Decision Making and Youth Resilience Correlates of Satisfaction With Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Todd Edwards; Caroline Ruta; Claudia Crilly Bellucci; Cassandra L Aspirnall; Ronald P Strauss; Tari D Topolski; Nichola J Rumsey; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Caregiver-Reported Outcomes and Barriers to Care among Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Kavitha Ranganathan; Anne K Patterson; Michaella K Baker; Christian J Vercler; Steven J Kasten; Steven R Buchman; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Interdisciplinary craniofacial teams compared with individual providers: is orofacial cleft care more comprehensive and do parents perceive better outcomes?

Authors:  April A Austin; Charlotte M Druschel; Margaret C Tyler; Paul A Romitti; Imara I West; Peter C Damiano; James M Robbins; Whitney Burnett
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-01

9.  Psychosocial acceptance of cleft patients: has something changed?

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Karsten Winter; Dirk Halama; Christian Wirtz; Vedat Yildirim; Nattapong Sirintawat; Sirintawat Nattapong
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-28

10.  Clinicians and laypeople assessment of facial attractiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate treated with LeFort I surgery or late maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Eun Hee Chung; Ali Borzabadi-Farahani; Stephen L-K Yen
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.