Literature DB >> 21327367

Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.

Ali Jannati1, Thomas M Spalek, Vincent Di Lollo.   

Abstract

Identification of the second of two targets (T1, T2, inserted in a stream of distractors) is impaired when presented within 500 ms after the first (attentional blink, AB). Barring a T1-T2 task-switch, it is thought that T2 must be backward-masked to obtain an AB (Giesbrecht & Di Lollo, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454-1466, 1998). We tested the hypothesis that Giesbrecht & Di Lollo's findings were vitiated by ceiling constraints arising from either response scale (experiment 1) or data limitations (experiment 2). In experiment 1, digit-distractors were replaced with pseudoletters to increase task difficulty, bringing performance below ceiling. An AB occurred without backward masking of T2. In experiment 2, a ceiling-free procedure estimated the number of noise dots needed for 80% T2 identification. An AB was revealed: fewer noise dots were required during the AB period than outside it. Both outcomes confirm that an AB can be obtained without either masking of T2 or task switching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327367     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0015-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Attentional requirements is visual detection and identification: evidence from the attentional blink.

Authors:  J Kawahara; V Di Lollo; J T Enns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The sparing is far from spurious: reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Johan Hulleman; Thomas Spalek; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; S M Shahab Ghorashi; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-29

4.  Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Walter F Bischof; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

5.  Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The attentional blink: increasing target salience provides no evidence for resource depletion. A commentary on Dux, Asplund, and Marois (2008).

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Thomas M Spalek; Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

Review 7.  A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution.

Authors:  B Giesbrecht; V Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contextual control over selective attention: evidence from a two-target method.

Authors:  Ellen MacLellan; David I Shore; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-17

2.  On the blink: the importance of target-distractor similarity in eliciting an attentional blink with faces.

Authors:  Kathrin Müsch; Andreas K Engel; Till R Schneider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.