Literature DB >> 17468912

Hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Brian M Smith1, Paul Perring, Milo Engoren, Joseph J Sferra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become the preferred method of providing long-term enteral nutrition. While hospitalized patients frequently have PEG inserted to facilitate enteral nutrition, little is known about these patients. The objective of the study was to determine hospital and long-term survival in patients who receive PEG while hospitalized for medical or surgical reasons.
METHODS: Records of all patients aged 18 years and older who underwent PEG between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004 at a university-affiliated community-based tertiary care center were examined.
RESULTS: 80 (11%) of 714 patients died during the index hospitalization. Older age, being married, mechanical ventilation, and dialysis were statistically significant predictors of hospital death (P < 0.05). There were nine complications and no deaths directly attributable to PEG. Overall survival was poor with 5.6% of patients dying within seven days of the procedure. Mortalities at 30, 60, and 365 days were 22%, 31% and 48%, respectively. Of the 80 patients who died prior to discharge, 40 (50%) died within one week of PEG placement. Fourteen (35%) of these 40 patients had treatment withdrawn. Kaplan-Meier median survival was 412 +/- 73 (mean +/- standard error) days. By Cox proportional hazard modeling, older age, cancer, heart disease, non-white race, and dialysis were significant predictors of post-PEG death (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after PEG is dependent on demographic factors and patient comorbidities. Given the very low initial complication rates, it may be advisable to delay PEG placement until just prior to discharge in order to prevent unnecessary procedures on those patients who are not likely to survive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468912     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9372-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of indications, complications and outcome.

Authors:  F B Nicholson; M G Korman; M A Richardson
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Operative and late coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in matched African-American versus Caucasian patients: evidence of a late survival-Medicaid association.

Authors:  Anoar Zacharias; Thomas A Schwann; Christopher J Riordan; Samuel J Durham; Aamir Shah; Robert H Habib
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Nutritional adequacy in patients receiving mechanical ventilation who are fed enterally.

Authors:  Colleen M O'Leary-Kelley; Kathleen A Puntillo; Juliana Barr; Nancy Stotts; Marilyn K Douglas
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  The association of marital status and hospice use in the USA.

Authors:  Nuha A Lackan; Glenn V Ostir; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  L Rabeneck; N P Wray; N J Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Shigehiko Uchino; Rinaldo Bellomo; Donna Goldsmith; Samantha Bates; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  A Lang; E Bardan; Y Chowers; E Sakhnini; H H Fidder; S Bar-Meir; B Avidan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Gastrostomy placement and mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  M D Grant; M A Rudberg; J A Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of two policies in a 4-year experience.

Authors:  Galia Abuksis; Meli Mor; Shlomit Plaut; Gerald Fraser; Yaron Niv
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.324

10.  Impact of renal dysfunction on weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  14 in total

1.  Endoscopic options for enteral feeding.

Authors:  Mark H Delegge
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-09

2.  Survival of geriatric patients after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in Japan.

Authors:  Yutaka Suzuki; Seryna Tamez; Akihiko Murakami; Akihiko Taira; Akihiro Mizuhara; Akira Horiuchi; Chie Mihara; Eiji Ako; Hirohito Muramatsu; Hitoshi Okano; Hitoshi Suenaga; Kazuaki Jomoto; Junya Kobayashi; Katsunari Takifuji; Kazuhiro Akiyama; Koh Tahara; Koji Onishi; Makoto Shimazaki; Masami Matsumoto; Masashi Ijima; Masato Murakami; Masato Nakahori; Michiaki Kudo; Michio Maruyama; Mikako Takahashi; Naohiro Washizawa; Shigeru Onozawa; Satoshi Goshi; Satoyoshi Yamashita; Shigeki Ono; Shin Imazato; Shinji Nishiwaki; Shuichirou Kitahara; Takao Endo; Takao Iiri; Takeshi Nagahama; Takuto Hikichi; Tatsuya Mikami; Tetsuo Yamamoto; Tetsushi Ogawa; Tomoko Ogawa; Tomoyuki Ohta; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Toshiroh Kura; Tsutomu Kikuchi; Tsuyoshi Iwase; Tsuyotoshi Tsuji; Yukio Nishiguchi; Mitsuyoshi Urashima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Safety and long-term outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Richard E Burney; Benjamin S Bryner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy After Cardiac Surgery: A Temporary Measure in a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Jared P Beller; Daniel Phadke; Elizabeth D Krebs; William Z Chancellor; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Robert G Sawyer; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T Yarboro
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Prospective experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes placed by otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons: safe and efficacious.

Authors:  Johanna Ruohoalho; Katri Aro; Antti A Mäkitie; Timo Atula; Aaro Haapaniemi; Harri Keski-Säntti; Leena Kylänpää; Annika Takala; Leif J Bäck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Risk factors and complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a case series of 1041 patients.

Authors:  Hans Juergen Richter-Schrag; Sabine Richter; Olaf Ruthmann; Manfred Olschewski; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Andreas Fischer
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Gastropexy can be as safe as conventional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and biomarkers do not predict short-term or long-term outcomes: a 7-year follow-up audit.

Authors:  Ross J Porter; Alastair W McKinlay; Emma L Metcalfe
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-13

8.  [Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Complications with and without anticoagulation].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Seitz; S Richter; G Marjanovic; M Olschewski; U T Hopt; A Fischer; H-J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Peritonitis from peg tube insertion in surgical intensive care unit patients: identification of risk factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Rachit D Shah; Nabil Tariq; Charles Shanley; James Robbins; Randy Janczyk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cardin
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.