Literature DB >> 10719742

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of indications, complications and outcome.

F B Nicholson1, M G Korman, M A Richardson.   

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was first described in 1980 as an effective method of feeding via the stomach in situations where oral intake is not possible. Its simplicity has led to its potential use in areas of dubious clinical benefit. Our unit has faced a major increase in referrals for PEG insertion over the last 2 years. For this reason we decided to audit our PEG insertion procedures with regard to indications, complications, outcome and follow up. We studied 168 patients who had an initial PEG insertion during the period 1 February 1996-31 January 1998. The medical records of these patients were reviewed with regard to the procedure, antibiotic use and complications. All patients (or carers or next of kin) were contacted by telephone to provide details regarding late complications and follow up. There were 87 females and 81 males (aged 16-98 years, median age 70 years). At 2 years, 67% were alive. The most frequent indication for PEG insertion was a neurological condition, the commonest being stroke. Most patients received either ticarcillin/clavulanic acid or cephazolin antibiotic prophylaxis before and after the procedure. In six patients (3.6%) infection at the PEG site required intravenous antibiotics. Four of these six patients did not have antibiotic prophylaxis. Only two deaths could be directly related to the procedure. Three died within 7 days of the procedure due to unrelated medical complications. Sixteen patients died within 1 month, the majority of these patients did not leave hospital. One-fifth of the patients (35/168) had their PEG removed due to the re-establishment of oral feeding, with median time of use, 4.3 months. It is a safe, effective feeding method in the elderly, but experience with case selection, the procedure and careful follow up remain essential. The use of prophylactic antibiotics resulted in few significant infections of the PEG site. Up to one-fifth of patients will require their PEG only for a short term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10719742     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  42 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: indications, techniques, complications and results.

Authors:  Barbara F Zuercher; Pierre Grosjean; Philippe Monnier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous radiological gastrostomy for swallowing disturbances.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Yongfan Zhao; Tianpeng Xie; Yang Hu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  Current considerations of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy.

Authors:  Yanfei Zhu; Liping Shi; Hao Tang; Guoqing Tao
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Survival of geriatric patients after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in Japan.

Authors:  Yutaka Suzuki; Seryna Tamez; Akihiko Murakami; Akihiko Taira; Akihiro Mizuhara; Akira Horiuchi; Chie Mihara; Eiji Ako; Hirohito Muramatsu; Hitoshi Okano; Hitoshi Suenaga; Kazuaki Jomoto; Junya Kobayashi; Katsunari Takifuji; Kazuhiro Akiyama; Koh Tahara; Koji Onishi; Makoto Shimazaki; Masami Matsumoto; Masashi Ijima; Masato Murakami; Masato Nakahori; Michiaki Kudo; Michio Maruyama; Mikako Takahashi; Naohiro Washizawa; Shigeru Onozawa; Satoshi Goshi; Satoyoshi Yamashita; Shigeki Ono; Shin Imazato; Shinji Nishiwaki; Shuichirou Kitahara; Takao Endo; Takao Iiri; Takeshi Nagahama; Takuto Hikichi; Tatsuya Mikami; Tetsuo Yamamoto; Tetsushi Ogawa; Tomoko Ogawa; Tomoyuki Ohta; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Toshiroh Kura; Tsutomu Kikuchi; Tsuyoshi Iwase; Tsuyotoshi Tsuji; Yukio Nishiguchi; Mitsuyoshi Urashima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  CT findings in gastrocolic fistula following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Suki Brown; Kieran McHugh; Sarah Ledermann; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-12-15

8.  Artificial nutrition: principles and practice of enteral feeding.

Authors:  David A J Lloyd; Jeremy Powell-Tuck
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

9.  Investigation and prediction of enteral nutrition problems after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Shiro Yokohama; Masaru Aoshima; Yukiomi Nakade; Junya Shindo; Junichi Maruyama; Masashi Yoneda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Shiro Yokohama; Masaru Aoshima; Toshiyuki Asama; Junya Shindo; Junichi Maruyama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.