Literature DB >> 31026430

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy After Cardiac Surgery: A Temporary Measure in a High-Risk Cohort.

Jared P Beller1, Daniel Phadke1, Elizabeth D Krebs1, William Z Chancellor1, J Hunter Mehaffey1, Robert B Hawkins1, Robert G Sawyer2, Gorav Ailawadi1, Leora T Yarboro3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients who undergo cardiac surgery require percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for enteral access to receive nutritional support. There are limited data evaluating the outcomes of these patients and the duration of nutritional support required.
METHODS: All cardiac surgery patients (1994 to 2017) were stratified by postoperative PEG requirement. Patients were excluded if they required preoperative nutritional support, began nutritional support more than 30 days postoperatively, or if the PEG was placed more than 90 days after the index cardiac operation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate overall survival and time to PEG removal. A Fine-Gray competing risk model was constructed to determine factors impacting PEG removal.
RESULTS: A total of 16,727 cardiac surgery patients were included, with 310 (1.9%) requiring PEG. The median time to PEG placement was 14.5 (interquartile range, 10 to 22) days with 1 (0.3%) PEG procedural mortality. One-year survival was 50.4% vs 91.8% in the general cardiac surgery population. A total of 113 patients had their PEG removed at a median of 255 days. Of living PEG patients at 1 year, 52.1% had their PEG removed. Factors that were associated with PEG removal were age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; P = .03), ejection fraction (HR, 1.03; P < .01), and renal failure (HR, 0.50; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who require PEG after cardiac surgery are a high-risk cohort. However, those who survive their acute illness often recover to a point where nutrition can be maintained without a feeding tube. These data provide meaningful information for counseling patients and their families that are considering PEG after cardiac surgery.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31026430      PMCID: PMC6755053          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  21 in total

1.  A nutrition support team led by general surgeons decreases inappropriate use of total parenteral nutrition on a surgical service.

Authors:  A R Saalwachter; H L Evans; K F Willcutts; K B O'Donnell; A E Radigan; S T McElearney; R L Smith; T W Chong; B D Schirmer; T L Pruett; R G Sawyer
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Disease-based mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: utility of the enterprise data warehouse.

Authors:  Benjamin K Poulose; Joan Kaiser; William C Beck; Pearlie Jackson; William H Nealon; Kenneth W Sharp; Michael D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  In-hospital and long-term outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignancy.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Xiaoxia Liu; Afrin Nuzhad; Guilherme Rabinowits; Vihas Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C L Braunschweig; P Levy; P M Sheean; X Wang
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Gastrostomy for enteral access. A comparison among placement by laparotomy, laparoscopy, and endoscopy.

Authors:  H S Ho; H Ngo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Factors predictive of survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the elderly: is dementia really a risk factor?

Authors:  Fumiyo Higaki; Osamu Yokota; Masahiro Ohishi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Brian M Smith; Paul Perring; Milo Engoren; Joseph J Sferra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management.

Authors:  Ata A Rahnemai-Azar; Amir A Rahnemaiazar; Rozhin Naghshizadian; Amparo Kurtz; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Predicting outcomes and complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  F A F Figueiredo; M C da Costa; A D Pelosi; R N Martins; L Machado; E Francioni
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Comparing open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Vishnu Ambur; Sharven Taghavi; Senthil Jayarajan; John Gaughan; Yoshiya Toyoda; Elizabeth Dauer; Lars Ola Sjoholm; Abhijit Pathak; Thomas Santora; Amy J Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.