Literature DB >> 15158297

Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of two policies in a 4-year experience.

Galia Abuksis1, Meli Mor, Shlomit Plaut, Gerald Fraser, Yaron Niv.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the technique of choice for long-term enteral nutrition. Though safe and technically simple, PEG has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality. AIM: We compared the outcome of strategies applied in two different periods; the original approach of PEG insertion during hospitalization (upon request), and PEG insertion 30 days after hospital discharge.
METHODS: A cohort of 127 patients scheduled for PEG insertion from 1.1.1997 to 31.12.2000, was evaluated. In 61 consecutive patients admitted from 1.1.1997 to 31.12.1998 the PEG insertion was planned during hospitalization, as close to the time of the physician's request (period 1). Sixty-six consecutive patients admitted from 1.1.1999 to 31.12.2000 were scheduled for the PEG insertion 30 days after discharge (period 2). The 30-day mortality rate was calculated from the time of the request. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to find predictive factors for 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: There were 61 patients with a mean age of 78+/-13 in period 1, and 66 patients with a mean age of 77.8+/-15.5 in period 2. There was no significant difference between patients of the two periods in regard to age, sex, underlying disease, nutritional and mental status. Patients received PEG 30 days after hospital discharge had a 40% lower 30-day mortality rate than patients who received PEG during hospitalization from the time of request for PEG (P=0.01) and a 87.5% lower rate when calculated from the time of insertion (P<0.0001). In-hospital PEG insertion, bed-ridden and disorientation were found to be independent factors predictive of 30-day mortality after PEG insertion (P=0.016,P=0.001, and P=0.0005, respectively).
CONCLUSION: PEG insertion during hospitalization increases mortality and should be avoided. A grace period of 30 days with nasogastric tube feeding before PEG insertion may prevent mortality and achieve a long-term enteral nutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15158297     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2003.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  14 in total

1.  [PEG tube placement in German geriatric wards - a retrospective data-base analysis].

Authors:  R Wirth; D Volkert; J M Bauer; R J Schulz; M Borchelt; C Fleischhauer; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; C C Sieber
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Is tube feeding futile in advanced dementia?

Authors:  Matthew C Lynch
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2016-08

3.  Regional Comparison of Enteral Nutrition-Related Admission Policies in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Authors:  Marissa Burgermaster; Eoin Slattery; Nafeesa Islam; Paul R Ippolito; David S Seres
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.080

4.  Hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Brian M Smith; Paul Perring; Milo Engoren; Joseph J Sferra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Airway infection predisposes to peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with high concordance between sputum and wound isolates.

Authors:  Chiao-Hsiung Chuang; Kuei-Hsiang Hung; Jen-Ru Chen; Chiung-Yu Chen; Ai-Wen Kao; Wei-Lun Chang; Jiunn-Jong Wu; Bor-Shyang Sheu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Senescent swallowing: impact, strategies, and interventions.

Authors:  Denise M Ney; Jennifer M Weiss; Amy J H Kind; JoAnne Robbins
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2009 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.080

7.  A better method for preventing infection of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Chao-Hung Kuo; Huang-Ming Hu; Pei-Yun Tsai; Chen-Ju Liu; Fang-Jung Yu; Ko Chang; Yong-Sang Pan; Angela Chen; Chang-Ming Jan; Wen-Ming Wang; Deng-Chyang Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Acceptability and outcomes of the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement--patients' and care givers' perspectives.

Authors:  Muhammad K Anis; Shahab Abid; Wasim Jafri; Zaigham Abbas; Hasnain A Shah; Saeed Hamid; Rozina Wasaya
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Patients' outcomes, adequacy and quality of information given to decision-makers and procedure acceptance.

Authors:  Petros Stathopoulos; George Karamanolis; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Dimitrios Polymeros; Angelos A Papadopoulos; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2011

10.  Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cardin
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.