Literature DB >> 17468257

Rationalizing the follow-up of pregnancies of unknown location.

E Kirk1, G Condous, B Van Calster, S Van Huffel, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To develop a strategy to rationalize the follow-up of pregnancies of unknown location (PULs) based on the predicted outcome using a mathematical model.
METHODS: Prospective interventional study. Women classified with a PUL had serum hCG levels taken at 0 and 48 h. A logistic regression model was used to predict PUL outcome at 48 h. Women were managed according to the model's prediction. If the model predicted an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) or ectopic pregnancy (EP), women underwent a repeat scan on day 7; if the model predicted a failing PUL and the hCG ratio was also <0.87, these women were discharged; if the model predicted a failing PUL and the hCG ratio was > or =0.87, serum hCG was repeated on day 7.
RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-three PULs were included; the final clinical outcomes were 22 (63.1%) failing PULs, 111 (30.6%) IUPs and 23 (6.3%) EPs. 88.7% (322/363) had the location of their pregnancy confirmed in the time period according to the study protocol, i.e. day 2 for failing PULs, day 7 for IUPs and EPs. By day 7, 97.5% (354/363) had been given a diagnosis and could be eliminated from any further follow-up. Only one woman (0.3%) underwent surgical intervention for the diagnosis of her pregnancy location-a diagnostic laparoscopy and surgical evacuation.
CONCLUSION: The logistic regression model developed could be used as a basis on which to rationalize the management of PULs as it can successfully minimize their follow-up by reducing the number of visits, scans and blood tests, as well as intervention rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468257     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome.

Authors:  Kurt Barnhart; Norah M van Mello; Tom Bourne; Emma Kirk; Ben Van Calster; Cecilia Bottomley; Karine Chung; George Condous; Steven Goldstein; Petra J Hajenius; Ben Willem Mol; Thomas Molinaro; Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Richard Husicka; Mary Sammel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Does a prediction model for pregnancy of unknown location developed in the UK validate on a US population?

Authors:  K T Barnhart; M D Sammel; D Appleby; M Rausch; T Molinaro; B Van Calster; E Kirk; G Condous; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The potential value of activin B and fibronectin for the triage of pregnancies of unknown location and prediction of first trimester viability.

Authors:  Maya Al-Memar; Shabnam Bobdiwala; Mayank Madhra; Srdjan Saso; Bavo De Cock; Ben Van Calster; Jeremy K Brown; Faizah Mukri; Cecilia Bottomley; Aris Papageorghiou; Dirk Timmerman; Andrew W Horne; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 4.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Florin-Andrei Taran; Karl-Oliver Kagan; Markus Hübner; Markus Hoopmann; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  The term "pregnancy of unknown location" is here to stay.

Authors:  George Condous; Simon Winder; Shannon Reid
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 6.  Factors to consider in pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Shabnam Bobdiwala; Maya Al-Memar; Jessica Farren; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-29

7.  Pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Pedro Paulo Pereira; Fábio Roberto Cabar; Úrsula Trovato Gomez; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Triaging Women with Pregnancy of Unknown Location: Evaluation of Protocols Based on Single Serum Progesterone, Serum hCG Ratios, and Model M4.

Authors:  Rubina Izhar; Samia Husain; Muhammad Ahmad Tahir; Syed Hasan Ala; Rahila Imtiaz; Sonia Husain; Sara Talha
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

9.  Endometriosis and Beta-hCG > 775 IU/l Increase the Risk of Non-tube-preserving Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin Nicolaus; Jorge Jimenez-Cruz; Dominik Michael Bräuer; Thomas Lehmann; Anke Regina Mothes; Ingo B Runnebaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.915

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.