Literature DB >> 1746666

Patterns of breast and cervical cancer screening at three public health centers in an inner-city urban area.

S Whitman1, D Ansell, L Lacey, E H Chen, N Ebie, J Dell, C W Phillips.   

Abstract

In an effort to examine breast and cervical cancer screening patterns among poor African-American urban women, medical records were abstracted at three public health centers located in the inner city of Chicago. The proportions of eligible women at these three centers who received Pap smears, breast examinations, and mammograms were computed. These proportions were notably low and differed significantly among the three centers. Because the literature is now suggesting that an appropriate sequence best defines adequate screening, sequences of screenings were also determined and were found to be lacking. All of these screening histories fall far below the screening objectives set by the National Cancer Institute for the year 2000. This information suggests that interventions are needed that will help health centers serving poor women to deliver more frequent cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1746666      PMCID: PMC1405273          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications.

Authors:  T A Farley; J T Flannery
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

3.  Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection.

Authors:  R Fink; S Shapiro; R Roester
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Screening for cervical cancer: 1982--an update.

Authors:  W T Creasman; W C Fowler; H D Homesley
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1982-11

5.  Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-07-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effect of population screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Authors:  Y van der Graaf; P J Klinkhamer; G P Vooijs
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Critique of the early cancer detection guidelines of the US Preventive Services Task Force and of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  C R Smart
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The severity of breast cancer at diagnosis: a comparison of age and extent of disease in black and white women.

Authors:  W A Satariano; S H Belle; G M Swanson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  The status of breast cancer screening: a quarter of a century of research.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Delivery of primary care to women. Do women's health centers do it better?

Authors:  E A Phelan; W Burke; R A Deyo; T D Koepsell; A Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and cancer screening among inner-city African-American women.

Authors:  J F Sung; D S Blumenthal; R J Coates; E Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved.

Authors:  R A Hiatt; R J Pasick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Mammography and Pap smear screening of Yaqui Indian women.

Authors:  P R Gordon; D Campos-Outcalt; L Steele; C Gonzales
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  A clinic-based mammography intervention targeting inner-city women.

Authors:  V Taylor; B Thompson; D Lessler; Y Yasui; D Montano; K M Johnson; J Mahloch; M Mullen; S Li; G Bassett; H I Goldberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Revisiting the effect of the Pap test on cervical cancer.

Authors:  N D Holmquist
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Using focus group methodology to develop breast cancer screening programs that recruit African American women.

Authors:  G A Williams; R R Abbott; D K Taylor
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1997-02

8.  Inner city primary care providers' breast cancer screening knowledge: implications for intervention.

Authors:  K M Johnson; V M Taylor; D Lessler; B Thompson; H I Goldberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1998-02

9.  An evaluation of the integration of non-traditional learning tools into a community based breast and cervical cancer education program: the Witness Project of Buffalo.

Authors:  Thelma C Hurd; Paola Muti; Deborah O Erwin; Sharita Womack
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.