Literature DB >> 9526722

Inner city primary care providers' breast cancer screening knowledge: implications for intervention.

K M Johnson1, V M Taylor, D Lessler, B Thompson, H I Goldberg.   

Abstract

Low income and minority women continue to have relatively low breast cancer screening rates. Since physician recommendation is one of the most important determinants of mammography participation, we aimed to characterize the breast cancer screening knowledge of primary care providers serving a socially disadvantaged population. The study was conducted at the Adult Medicine Clinic of Seattle's county hospital. All attending physicians, resident physicians, and mid-level practitioners were asked to complete a questionnaire in the spring of 1995. Forty-nine of 52 (94%) eligible providers completed the survey. The respondents generally agreed with published guidelines for screening mammography use. In contrast, they had relatively low levels of knowledge about breast cancer risk factors and the effectiveness of other breast cancer screening methods. Additionally, providers tended to over-estimate their breast cancer screening knowledge and skills. For example, 69% believed that they could answer patients' questions about mammography, but only 23% were aware of Medicaid's reimbursement policy for the procedure. For some variables, attending physicians were no more knowledgeable than resident physicians. Our results reinforce the need for increased preventive care training in medical schools and primary care residency programs. Educational programs for providers serving disadvantaged populations might usefully focus on pragmatic issues such as institutional costs and public payer reimbursement policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9526722     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018784319820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  30 in total

1.  Mammography attitudes and usage study, 1992.

Authors:  J A Horton; M C Romans; D F Cruess
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  1992

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview.

Authors:  G D Dodd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Breast cancer (1)

Authors:  J R Harris; M E Lippman; U Veronesi; W Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; E M John
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 7.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study. An appraisal and implications for early detection policy.

Authors:  C J Mettlin; C R Smart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Detroit's avoidable mortality project: breast cancer control for inner-city women.

Authors:  R C Burack; P A Gimotty; W Stengle; D Eckert; L Warbasse; A Moncrease
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Repeat mammography use among women ages 50-75.

Authors:  V M Taylor; S H Taplin; N Urban; E White; S Peacock
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.