Literature DB >> 17458442

Intact emotion-induced recognition bias in neuropsychological patients with executive control deficits.

Sabine Windmann1, Till Schneider, Julia Reczio, Martin Grobosch, Volker Voelzke, Valerie Blasius, Andrea Brämer, Werner Ischebeck, Grazyna Janikowski, Winfried Mandrella, Claudia Unger, Larissa Wischnjak.   

Abstract

In recognition memory tasks, emotionally negative words are judged more often as "old" relative to emotionally neutral words, suggesting a shift in response bias. We wondered whether this bias shift was due to the flexible regulation of executive control during memory retrieval. To address this question, we investigated individuals with high variability in executive control functions. As expected, we observed that emotional word meaning did indeed have a strong influence on the bias toward responding "old," independent of recognition accuracy and overall response bias. However, these effects were uncorrelated with executive control, as measured by the Trail Making Test, and were fully intact, even in a sample of hospitalized neurological patients with severe executive dysfunctions, some of whom had marked damage in fronto-thalamo-striatal networks. Having concluded that the emotion-induced bias must develop on different grounds, we went on to discuss alternative explanations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17458442     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.6.4.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  35 in total

Review 1.  Attention, automaticity, and affective disorder.

Authors:  G Matthews; A Wells
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2000-01

2.  Confidence in recognition memory for words: dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval.

Authors:  R N Henson; M D Rugg; T Shallice; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: effects of the stimulus presentation format.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Irene Daum; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  ERP indices of emotionality and semantic cohesiveness during recognition judgments.

Authors:  Heather E McNeely; Jane Dywan; Sidney J Segalowitz
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Cognitive and neural mechanisms of decision biases in recognition memory.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Hugo Critchley; Ralf Deichmann; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spontaneous confabulators fail to suppress currently irrelevant memory traces.

Authors:  A Schnider; R Ptak
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Building and burying fear memories in the brain.

Authors:  Stephen Maren
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Stereotype activation and control of race bias: cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Cheryl L Dickter; Marc A Sestir
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-02

10.  Performance of girls with ADHD and comparison girls on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure: evidence for executive processing deficits.

Authors:  Nilofar Sami; Estol T Carte; Stephen P Hinshaw; Brian A Zupan
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  Youth are more Vulnerable to False Memories than Middle-Aged Adults due to Liberal Response Bias.

Authors:  Liesel-Ann C Meusel; Glenda M Macqueen; Gurpreet Jaswal; Margaret C McKinnon
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.