Literature DB >> 23133463

Youth are more Vulnerable to False Memories than Middle-Aged Adults due to Liberal Response Bias.

Liesel-Ann C Meusel1, Glenda M Macqueen, Gurpreet Jaswal, Margaret C McKinnon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies show changes in vulnerability to false memory formation across development and into senescence. No study, however, has compared false memory formation in the critical transition period spanning late adolescence to middle adulthood.
METHOD: Using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, we explored the effects of age and of emotion on false memory formation in youth (16 to 23 years of age) and in middle-aged adults (29 to 58 years of age).
RESULTS: We found that youth endorsed more false lure items than middle-aged adults. This increased vulnerability to false memory formation stemmed from a more liberal response bias in the younger group.
CONCLUSIONS: Youth have a more liberal response criterion than middle-aged adults that contributes to an increased vulnerability to false memory formation. Subsequent age-related changes in response bias may reflect the maturation of frontal and temporal regions. In youth, a more liberal response bias may contribute to the heightened propensity for poor decision-making seen in this population.

Keywords:  DRM; development; false memory; youth

Year:  2012        PMID: 23133463      PMCID: PMC3490530     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1719-8429


  43 in total

1.  Age differences in veridical and false recall are not inevitable: the role of frontal lobe function.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Amanda L Price; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

2.  Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words?

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

3.  Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance--United States, 2003 (Abridged).

Authors:  Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; James Ross; Joseph Hawkins; Richard Lowry; William A Harris; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Janet Collins
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  Differential contributions of prefrontal, medial temporal, and sensory-perceptual regions to true and false memory formation.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

6.  Effects of guided imagery on memory distortion in women reporting recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.

Authors:  S A Clancy; R J McNally; D L Schacter
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  1999-10

7.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

8.  Dynamic mapping of normal human hippocampal development.

Authors:  Nitin Gogtay; Tom F Nugent; David H Herman; Anna Ordonez; Deanna Greenstein; Kiralee M Hayashi; Liv Clasen; Arthur W Toga; Jay N Giedd; Judith L Rapoport; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 9.  Cognition and depression: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Ian H Gotlib; Jutta Joormann
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

10.  Global gist extraction in children and adults.

Authors:  James Michael Lampinen; Juliana K Leding; Kelly B Reed; Timothy N Odegard
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.