Literature DB >> 10641368

Attention, automaticity, and affective disorder.

G Matthews1, A Wells.   

Abstract

This article reviews possible mechanisms for attentional bias in affective disorders and anxiety. Attentional bias is sometimes conceptualized as automatic in nature. However, there are methodological difficulties with studies purporting to demonstrate automaticity, and empirical and simulation evidence suggest that bias may be predominantly strategic. Bias in the voluntary control of attention may be driven by coping strategies, which in turn depend on appraisal of external demands, metacognitions of mental function, access of self-relevant knowledge in long-term memory, and self-focus of attention. The Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model of emotion and attention specifies how these processes interact to influence attentional control. Clinical disorder is associated with loss of dynamic adaptability and a syndrome of perseverative rumination and worry that directs attention toward monitoring for threat and away from restructuring of maladaptive self-knowledge. Implications of the S-REF model for therapeutic interventions directed toward attentional control are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641368     DOI: 10.1177/0145445500241004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Modif        ISSN: 0145-4455


  8 in total

1.  Intact emotion-induced recognition bias in neuropsychological patients with executive control deficits.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Till Schneider; Julia Reczio; Martin Grobosch; Volker Voelzke; Valerie Blasius; Andrea Brämer; Werner Ischebeck; Grazyna Janikowski; Winfried Mandrella; Claudia Unger; Larissa Wischnjak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Enhanced attention capture by emotional stimuli in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Venla Kuusinen; Maarja Brause; Jari Peräkylä; Markus Polvivaara; Rodolfo dos Santos Ribeiro; Juha Öhman; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Fear of Uncertainty Makes You More Anxious? Effect of Intolerance of Uncertainty on College Students' Social Anxiety: A Moderated Mediation Model.

Authors:  Jie Li; Ying Xia; Xinying Cheng; Shijia Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 4.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

5.  Traits, states, and attentional gates: temperament and threat relevance as predictors of attentional bias to social threat.

Authors:  Erik G Helzer; Jennifer K Connor-Smith; Marjorie A Reed
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2009-01

6.  Low attentional engagement makes attention network activity susceptible to emotional interference.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Natasha Pickard; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Keith H Ogawa; Robert T Knight; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Breaking the Cybernetic Code: Understanding and Treating the Human Metacognitive Control System to Enhance Mental Health.

Authors:  Adrian Wells
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-12

8.  Executive function does not predict coping with symptoms in stable patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Maarten Bak; Lydia Krabbendam; Philippe Delespaul; Karola Huistra; Wil Walraven; Jim van Os
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.