Literature DB >> 14693007

ERP indices of emotionality and semantic cohesiveness during recognition judgments.

Heather E McNeely1, Jane Dywan, Sidney J Segalowitz.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to examine the impact of emotionality on false recognition. In Experiment 1, participants discriminated previously studied words from neutral and negatively valenced emotional foils. Emotional words elicited a more positive ERP than did neutral words and emotional foils were falsely recognized more often than neutral foils. In Experiment 2, the hypothesis that emotionality-based false recognition is due to the semantic cohesiveness of emotional words was tested by including a highly associated but emotionally neutral category (animals). It was emotional and not animal foils that elicited greater positivity in the ERP and increased false positive response. These data provide little support for semantic cohesiveness as the basis for false recognition effects, but are consistent with the view that the salience of emotional words can be falsely attributed to familiarity in the context of a recognition task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14693007     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  Interactions between mood and the structure of semantic memory: event-related potentials evidence.

Authors:  Ana P Pinheiro; Elisabetta del Re; Paul G Nestor; Robert W McCarley; Óscar F Gonçalves; Margaret Niznikiewicz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Intact emotion-induced recognition bias in neuropsychological patients with executive control deficits.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Till Schneider; Julia Reczio; Martin Grobosch; Volker Voelzke; Valerie Blasius; Andrea Brämer; Werner Ischebeck; Grazyna Janikowski; Winfried Mandrella; Claudia Unger; Larissa Wischnjak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words.

Authors:  Markus J Hofmann; Lars Kuchinke; Sascha Tamm; Melissa L-H Võ; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Distinguishing between attributional and mnemonic sources of familiarity: the case of positive emotion bias.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Laura K Stone; Hannah S Hatch; Simone Schnall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

5.  Interactions of Emotion and Self-reference in Source Memory: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Diana R Pereira; Adriana Sampaio; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.

Authors:  Michaela Rohr; Johannes Tröger; Nils Michely; Alarith Uhde; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

7.  Impaired memory retrieval after psychosocial stress in healthy young men.

Authors:  Sabrina Kuhlmann; Marcel Piel; Oliver T Wolf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sleep deprivation impairs binding of information with its context.

Authors:  Courtney A Kurinec; Paul Whitney; John M Hinson; Devon A Hansen; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.313

9.  Effect of emotional valence on episodic memory stages as indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Marc E Lavoie; Kieron P O'Connor
Journal:  World J Neurosci       Date:  2013

10.  Effects of Sulpiride on True and False Memories of Thematically Related Pictures and Associated Words in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Regina V Guarnieri; Rafaela L Ribeiro; Altay A Lino de Souza; José Carlos F Galduróz; Luciene Covolan; Orlando F A Bueno
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.