PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the rebound tonometer (RT) and the Goldmann handheld tonometer (GT) in normal and altered corneas. METHODS: A total of 208 normal corneas and 50 corneas with pathologies were included in this prospective study. All measurements were randomly obtained by 1 observer. The medians and interquartile range (IR) for both tonometers were compared. The median differences were assessed in IOP groups. Agreement between the tonometers was calculated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The median IOP in all eyes was 17 mm Hg (IR, 13-22 mm Hg) with the RT and 16 mm Hg (IR, 13-21 mm Hg) with the GT (P < 0.001). The correlation was excellent between tonometers (r2 = 0.86; P < 0.001). The minimal differences between the two were obtained from 10 to 20 mm Hg (GT). The Bland-Altman scatterplot obtained good agreement between the instruments. In normal corneas, the median difference was < or =2 mm Hg in 77.4% of cases. In the altered corneas, the median difference was < or =2 mm Hg in 73% of cases (P = 0.21 compared with the normal group). In 10% and 2% of cases, the IOP could not be measured using the GT and RT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results were similar for both tonometers. In the altered corneas, the IOP could be difficult to obtain with the GT because of distorted half-circles. The 1-mm-diameter disposable RT tip facilitated obtaining measurements without anesthetic drops, which avoids infections. The RT could be useful in routine clinical settings when measuring IOP in corneas with pathologies.
PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the rebound tonometer (RT) and the Goldmann handheld tonometer (GT) in normal and altered corneas. METHODS: A total of 208 normal corneas and 50 corneas with pathologies were included in this prospective study. All measurements were randomly obtained by 1 observer. The medians and interquartile range (IR) for both tonometers were compared. The median differences were assessed in IOP groups. Agreement between the tonometers was calculated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The median IOP in all eyes was 17 mm Hg (IR, 13-22 mm Hg) with the RT and 16 mm Hg (IR, 13-21 mm Hg) with the GT (P < 0.001). The correlation was excellent between tonometers (r2 = 0.86; P < 0.001). The minimal differences between the two were obtained from 10 to 20 mm Hg (GT). The Bland-Altman scatterplot obtained good agreement between the instruments. In normal corneas, the median difference was < or =2 mm Hg in 77.4% of cases. In the altered corneas, the median difference was < or =2 mm Hg in 73% of cases (P = 0.21 compared with the normal group). In 10% and 2% of cases, the IOP could not be measured using the GT and RT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results were similar for both tonometers. In the altered corneas, the IOP could be difficult to obtain with the GT because of distorted half-circles. The 1-mm-diameter disposable RT tip facilitated obtaining measurements without anesthetic drops, which avoids infections. The RT could be useful in routine clinical settings when measuring IOP in corneas with pathologies.