Literature DB >> 17452638

Nonrandom variations in human cancer ESTs indicate that mRNA heterogeneity increases during carcinogenesis.

Marie Brulliard1, Dalia Lorphelin, Olivier Collignon, Walter Lorphelin, Benoit Thouvenot, Emmanuel Gothié, Sandrine Jacquenet, Virginie Ogier, Olivier Roitel, Jean-Marie Monnez, Pierre Vallois, Frances T Yen, Olivier Poch, Marc Guenneugues, Gilles Karcher, Pierre Oudet, Bernard E Bihain.   

Abstract

Virtually all cancer biological attributes are heterogeneous. Because of this, it is currently difficult to reconcile results of cancer transcriptome and proteome experiments. It is also established that cancer somatic mutations arise at rates higher than suspected, but yet are insufficient to explain all cancer cell heterogeneity. We have analyzed sequence variations of 17 abundantly expressed genes in a large set of human ESTs originating from either normal or cancer samples. We show that cancer ESTs have greater variations than normal ESTs for >70% of the tested genes. These variations cannot be explained by known and putative SNPs. Furthermore, cancer EST variations were not random, but were determined by the composition of the substituted base (b0) as well as that of the bases located upstream (up to b - 4) and downstream (up to b + 3) of the substitution event. The replacement base was also not randomly selected but corresponded in most cases (73%) to a repetition of b - 1 or of b + 1. Base substitutions follow a specific pattern of affected bases: A and T substitutions were preferentially observed in cancer ESTs. In contrast, cancer somatic mutations [Sjoblom T, et al. (2006) Science 314:268-274] and SNPs identified in the genes of the current study occurred preferentially with C and G. On the basis of these observations, we developed a working hypothesis that cancer EST heterogeneity results primarily from increased transcription infidelity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17452638      PMCID: PMC1855071          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611076104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Functions and mechanisms of RNA editing.

Authors:  J M Gott; R B Emeson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 3.  Changing genetic information through RNA editing.

Authors:  S Maas; A Rich
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  RNA polymerase II structure: from core to functional complexes.

Authors:  Patrick Cramer
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Getting the noise out of gene arrays.

Authors:  Eliot Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Template misalignment in multisubunit RNA polymerases and transcription fidelity.

Authors:  Ekaterina Kashkina; Michael Anikin; Florian Brueckner; Richard T Pomerantz; William T McAllister; Patrick Cramer; Dmitry Temiakov
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  dbEST--database for "expressed sequence tags".

Authors:  M S Boguski; T M Lowe; C M Tolstoshev
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Transcriptional slippage of p53 gene enhanced by cellular damage in rat liver: monitoring the slippage by a yeast functional assay.

Authors:  Y Ba; H Tonoki; M Tada; D Nakata; J Hamada; T Moriuchi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-02-14       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Molecular misreading: a new type of transcript mutation expressed during aging.

Authors:  F W van Leeuwen; D F Fischer; D Kamel; J A Sluijs; M A Sonnemans; R Benne; D F Swaab; A Salehi; E M Hol
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 10.  Cancer genes and the pathways they control.

Authors:  Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  11 in total

1.  Potential role of phenotypic mutations in the evolution of protein expression and stability.

Authors:  Moshe Goldsmith; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Transcriptional frameshifts contribute to protein allergenicity.

Authors:  Benoit Thouvenot; Olivier Roitel; Julie Tomasina; Benoit Hilselberger; Christelle Richard; Sandrine Jacquenet; Françoise Codreanu-Morel; Martine Morisset; Gisèle Kanny; Etienne Beaudouin; Christine Delebarre-Sauvage; Thierry Olivry; Claude Favrot; Bernard E Bihain
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Inositol-requiring enzyme 1alpha is a key regulator of angiogenesis and invasion in malignant glioma.

Authors:  Gregor Auf; Arnaud Jabouille; Sylvaine Guérit; Raphaël Pineau; Maylis Delugin; Marion Bouchecareilh; Noël Magnin; Alexandre Favereaux; Marlène Maitre; Timo Gaiser; Andreas von Deimling; Marcus Czabanka; Peter Vajkoczy; Eric Chevet; Andreas Bikfalvi; Michel Moenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heritable change caused by transient transcription errors.

Authors:  Alasdair J E Gordon; Dominik Satory; Jennifer A Halliday; Christophe Herman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  A link between transcription fidelity and pausing in vivo.

Authors:  Pamela Gamba; Katherine James; Nikolay Zenkin
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2017-01-10

6.  Misincorporation by RNA polymerase is a major source of transcription pausing in vivo.

Authors:  Katherine James; Pamela Gamba; Simon J Cockell; Nikolay Zenkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  High mutability of the tumor suppressor genes RASSF1 and RBSP3 (CTDSPL) in cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir I Kashuba; Tatiana V Pavlova; Elvira V Grigorieva; Alexey Kutsenko; Surya Pavan Yenamandra; Jingfeng Li; Fuli Wang; Alexei I Protopopov; Veronika I Zabarovska; Vera Senchenko; Klas Haraldson; Tatiana Eshchenko; Julia Kobliakova; Olga Vorontsova; Igor Kuzmin; Eleonora Braga; Vladimir M Blinov; Lev L Kisselev; Yi-Xin Zeng; Ingemar Ernberg; Michael I Lerman; George Klein; Eugene R Zabarovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Increased frequency of single base substitutions in a population of transcripts expressed in cancer cells.

Authors:  Laurent Bianchetti; David Kieffer; Rémi Féderkeil; Olivier Poch
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Systems biology of cancer: entropy, disorder, and selection-driven evolution to independence, invasion and "swarm intelligence".

Authors:  M Tarabichi; A Antoniou; M Saiselet; J M Pita; G Andry; J E Dumont; V Detours; C Maenhaut
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 10.  Transcription fidelity and its roles in the cell.

Authors:  Pamela Gamba; Nikolay Zenkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.