Literature DB >> 1744774

Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling.

M S Banks1, A B Sekuler, S J Anderson.   

Abstract

We examined the contribution of optical and photoreceptor properties as well as receptor pooling to eccentricity-dependent variations in spatial vision by comparing the performance of ideal observers with that of human observers. We measured contrast sensitivity functions in human observers and calculated such functions in ideal observers for retinal eccentricities of 0-40 deg. Comparisons of human and ideal performance in a variety of tasks reveal that many aspects of the variation in spatial vision with eccentricity can be understood from an analysis of the discrimination information available at the retinal ganglion cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744774     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.8.001775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  28 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Modal content of living human cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Zhuolin Liu; Omer P Kocaoglu; Timothy L Turner; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Chromatic detection from cone photoreceptors to V1 neurons to behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Charles A Hass; Juan M Angueyra; Zachary Lindbloom-Brown; Fred Rieke; Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

7.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope-based microperimetry.

Authors:  William S Tuten; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Attentional dynamics of infant visual foraging.

Authors:  Steven S Robertson; Sarah Enos Watamura; Makeba Parramore Wilbourn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Loss of sensitivity in an analog neural circuit.

Authors:  Bart G Borghuis; Peter Sterling; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.