Literature DB >> 26523737

Chromatic detection from cone photoreceptors to V1 neurons to behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Charles A Hass, Juan M Angueyra, Zachary Lindbloom-Brown, Fred Rieke, Gregory D Horwitz.   

Abstract

Chromatic sensitivity cannot exceed limits set by noise in the cone photoreceptors. To determine how close neurophysiological and psychophysical chromatic sensitivity come to these limits, we developed a parameter-free model of stimulus encoding in the cone outer segments, and we compared the sensitivity of the model to the psychophysical sensitivity of monkeys performing a detection task and to the sensitivity of individual V1 neurons. Modeled cones had a temporal impulse response and a noise power spectrum that were derived from in vitro recordings of macaque cones, and V1 recordings were made during performance of the detection task. The sensitivity of the simulated cone mosaic, the V1 neurons, and the monkeys were tightly yoked for low-spatiotemporal-frequency isoluminant modulations, indicating high-fidelity signal transmission for this class of stimuli. Under the conditions of our experiments and the assumptions for our model, the signal-to-noise ratio for these stimuli dropped by a factor of ∼3 between the cones and perception. Populations of weakly correlated V1 neurons narrowly exceeded the monkeys' chromatic sensitivity but fell well short of the cones' chromatic sensitivity, suggesting that most of the behavior-limiting noise lies between the cone outer segments and the output of V1. The sensitivity gap between the cones and behavior for achromatic stimuli was larger than for chromatic stimuli, indicating greater postreceptoral noise. The cone mosaic model provides a means to compare visual sensitivity across disparate stimuli and to identify sources of noise that limit visual sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26523737      PMCID: PMC4633035          DOI: 10.1167/15.15.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  57 in total

1.  A four-surface schematic eye of macaque monkey obtained by an optical method.

Authors:  P Lapuerta; S J Schein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic interference fringes.

Authors:  N Sekiguchi; D R Williams; D H Brainard
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Colour is what the eye sees best.

Authors:  A Chaparro; C F Stromeyer; E P Huang; R E Kronauer; R T Eskew
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Relative contributions of optical and neural limitations to human contrast sensitivity at different luminance levels.

Authors:  M A Losada; R Navarro; J Santamaría
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Color, contrast sensitivity, and the cone mosaic.

Authors:  D Williams; N Sekiguchi; D Brainard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Physiological mechanisms underlying psychophysical sensitivity to combined luminance and chromatic modulation.

Authors:  B B Lee; P R Martin; A Valberg; J Kremers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Spectral sensitivities of the human cones.

Authors:  A Stockman; D I MacLeod; N E Johnson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance.

Authors:  E Zohary; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparison of photoreceptor spatial density and ganglion cell morphology in the retina of human, macaque monkey, cat, and the marmoset Callithrix jacchus.

Authors:  A K Goodchild; K K Ghosh; P R Martin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-02-26       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Detection mechanisms in L-, M-, and S-cone contrast space.

Authors:  G R Cole; T Hine; W McIlhagga
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Feedforward and feedback sources of choice probability in neural population responses.

Authors:  Bruce G Cumming; Hendrikje Nienborg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Visual stimulus-driven functional organization of macaque prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Theodros M Haile; Kaitlin S Bohon; Maria C Romero; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Temporal Limits of Visual Motion Processing: Psychophysics and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Bart G Borghuis; Duje Tadin; Martin J M Lankheet; Joseph S Lappin; Wim A van de Grind
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-26

4.  Temporal filtering of luminance and chromaticity in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-05-18

5.  Temporal information loss in the macaque early visual system.

Authors:  Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.593

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.