Literature DB >> 3416614

How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect.

P W Halligan1, J C Marshall.   

Abstract

We report a case of severe left visual neglect consequent upon extensive infarction in the territory of the right middle cerebral artery. A detailed analysis is given of the patient's performance on line bisection. The stimuli cover a wider range of lengths than is usually employed in such studies (11'' to 1''). The magnitude of the patient's rightward displacement of his transections is linearly related to the length of the stimulus line, such that the longer the line, the greater the left 'neglect'. At line length 2'', the patient's transections are relatively accurate, and at length 1'', the transections cross the objective midpoint to give a reliable left displacement (= 'right neglect'). On some occasions, these latter transections are placed beyond the leftmost point of the stimulus line. We interpret the data in terms of two constructs: (a) an 'attentional boundary' placed slightly to the left of the objective midline; (b) 'representational completion' that extends to the attentional boundary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3416614     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(88)80040-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  23 in total

Review 1.  Hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  A Parton; P Malhotra; M Husain
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Leftward search in left unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; M Sugishita; K Mitani; M Ishizawa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect.

Authors:  R Tegnér; M Levander
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Two techniques for the assessment of line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: a single case study.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Crossover by line length and spatial location.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; C Pierce; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  P Azouvi; C Samuel; A Louis-Dreyfus; T Bernati; P Bartolomeo; J-M Beis; S Chokron; M Leclercq; F Marchal; Y Martin; G De Montety; S Olivier; D Perennou; P Pradat-Diehl; C Prairial; G Rode; E Siéroff; L Wiart; M Rousseaux
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Carlo Umiltà; Konstantinos Priftis; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Diminution and enhancement of visuo-spatial neglect with sequential trials.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall; D T Wade
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.